Showing two ordered pairs are parallel

  • Thread starter Thread starter CaptainSFS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parallel
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between ordered pairs in the context of perpendicularity and parallelism. The original poster seeks to understand how to demonstrate that two ordered pairs, p1 and p3, are parallel given that p1 is perpendicular to p2 and p2 is perpendicular to p3.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definitions of ordered pairs, parallelism, and perpendicularity, questioning how these concepts apply to the problem. There is an attempt to manipulate the equations representing perpendicularity to derive a relationship between p1 and p3.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants engaging in reasoning about the relationships between the ordered pairs. Some guidance has been offered regarding the manipulation of equations, and participants are questioning the validity of dividing one equation by another, indicating a productive exploration of the mathematical principles involved.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted uncertainty regarding the definitions of terms such as "ordered pairs" and the implications of these definitions on the concepts of parallelism and perpendicularity. Participants also express concern about cases where terms may be zero, which could affect their reasoning.

CaptainSFS
Messages
57
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We say two ordered pairs p1=(x1,y1) and p2=(x2,y2) are perpendicular if and only if x1x2 +y1y2=0.

For any three ordered pairs p1, p2, and p3, if p1 is perpendicular to p2 and p2 is perpendicular to p3 then how would I show that p1 is parallel to p3?

I believe I need to somehow show that p1 and p3 have a similar scalar, but I do not know how to show that work. So if someone could show me, that would be awesome.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


haha, i tried setting the two perpendicular equations equal to each other, but I don't know if that amounted to anything.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CaptainSFS said:

Homework Statement


We say two ordered pairs p1=(x1,y1) and p2=(x2,y2) are perpendicular if and only if x1x2 +y1y2=0.
I don't understand. I would tend to associate "ordered pairs" (ordered pairs of numbers or points?) with a point and points are not "parallel" or "pependicular". What are you definitions of "ordered pairs", "parallel", and "perpendicular" in this situation?

For any three ordered pairs p1, p2, and p3, if p1 is perpendicular to p2 and p2 is perpendicular to p3 then how would I show that p1 is parallel to p3?

I believe I need to somehow show that p1 and p3 have a similar scalar, but I do not know how to show that work. So if someone could show me, that would be awesome.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


haha, i tried setting the two perpendicular equations equal to each other, but I don't know if that amounted to anything.
 
Ok, so you have p1x*p2x=-p1y*p2y and p3x*p2x=-p3y*p2y. What do you conclude if you divide those equations by each other? You should probably also worry about what happens if some of those terms happen to be zero, but I'll leave that case up to you.
 
Hey thanks for your help. that makes sense because they will always equal each other then if they are parallel. i was along the right track i think, but for some reason it makes sense. haha. thanks again for your help.

I have one more question though. Why are you allowed to divide the first equation by the second?
 
Last edited:
CaptainSFS said:
Hey thanks for your help. that makes sense because they will always equal each other then if they are parallel. i was along the right track i think, but for some reason it makes sense. haha. thanks again for your help.

I have one more question though. Why are you allowed to divide the first equation by the second?

If a=b and c=d and c and d are not zero then a/c=b/d. Right? It's sort of in the nature of equality.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K