Finding limits without epsilon and delta

  • Thread starter kingstrick
  • Start date
  • #1
kingstrick
108
0

Homework Statement




I need to prove that 1/n has a limit of zero using the following definition:

The statement that the point sequence p1, p2, . . . converges to the point x means that if S is an open interval containing x then there is a positive integer N such that if n is a positive integer and n ≥ N then pn ∈ S.

and

The statement that the sequence p1, p2, p3, . . . converges means that there is a point x such that p1, p2, p3, . . . converges to x.

Homework Equations



the instructor was adamant that we are not to use epsilon delta in these proofs for our text does not use such notions. But I am at a lost as to how we prove it without them. Do I just substitute a different variable in the epsilon and delta places? Any advice on how to get started would be appreciated.

The Attempt at a Solution



This is my second attempt in a real analysis class :( It is amazing how different the material is from course to course even for the same course.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #3
kingstrick
108
0
I know but we haven't 'learned' bounding or monotonic yet. All we have is this definition to go by.
 
  • #4
13,926
7,874
I know but we haven't 'learned' bounding or monotonic yet. All we have is this definition to go by.

Then you must find something in the definition that will help you. You could also try rereading your book to see if there is something in the discussion or even in the problem sets that might give you a clue.
 
  • #5
HallsofIvy
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
43,021
970
To prove that 1/n converges to 0, show that if U is some open interval containing 0 then there exist N such that if n> N then 1/n is in U.

Since U is an open interval containing 0, there exist some number, d, such that the interval (-d, d) is a subset of U. Now show that, for sufficiently large N, if n> N then 1/n is in (-d, d). (Since n> 0, that is equivlent to 1/n< d. How large must n be?)
 
  • #6
kingstrick
108
0
n>d ?
 
  • #7
Ray Vickson
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Dearly Missed
10,706
1,722
n>d ?

Well, suppose d = 0.0001. How large must n be to have 1/n < 0.0001? You claim n > 0.0001 will do. Do you really think that?
 
  • #8
kingstrick
108
0
Well, suppose d = 0.0001. How large must n be to have 1/n < 0.0001? You claim n > 0.0001 will do. Do you really think that?

I see what you mean.

in your case n would have to be >10000

so then.... n > 1/d
 
  • #9
kingstrick
108
0
To prove that 1/n converges to 0, show that if U is some open interval containing 0 then there exist N such that if n> N then 1/n is in U.

Since U is an open interval containing 0, there exist some number, d, such that the interval (-d, d) is a subset of U. Now show that, for sufficiently large N, if n> N then 1/n is in (-d, d). (Since n> 0, that is equivlent to 1/n< d. How large must n be?)

What always stumbles me here though, is what exactly is N? Is it like the Nth term in my sequence? Or is it any random value N, there is a nth term (referring to little n) to the right?
 
  • #10
kingstrick
108
0
So here is my solution to a similar problem, is my solution/approach correct?

Prove that M = {1, 1+1/2, 1+1/4, 1 + 1/6, ...} has a limit point of 1.

Let M = {1, 1+1/2, 1+1/4, 1 + 1/6, ...} and U be some open interval containing 1. Since U is an open interval (a,b) where a<1<b, there exists some d [itex]\neq [/itex]1 in (1,b) such that a [itex]\leq[/itex] (a+d)/2 <1 < (b+d)/2 [itex]\leq[/itex] b. Observe that M is [itex]\geq [/itex] 1and ((a+d)/2, (b+d)/2) is an open interval and a subset of U. Let n be a natural number and n>N where N [itex]\in[/itex] R and 1+1/n < d. Then 1/n < d-1 < d. Then n> 1/d.

Therefore 1 is a limit point.
 

Suggested for: Finding limits without epsilon and delta

Replies
9
Views
442
Replies
4
Views
600
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
928
Replies
11
Views
400
Replies
4
Views
443
Replies
3
Views
370
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
98
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
266
Top