Sig Figs: Converting Celsius to Kelvin & Graphing Moles vs Time

  • Thread starter Thread starter caljuice
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemistry
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the conversion of Celsius to Kelvin and the implications of significant figures (sig figs) in calculations involving temperature and graphing data. Participants explore the rules of sig figs in the context of addition, division, and the representation of data in scientific contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes converting 22.5°C to Kelvin using the formula 273.15 + 22.5, questioning the appropriate number of sig figs for the result.
  • There is uncertainty regarding whether to use 1/(273.15 + 22.5) or 1/295.7 for further calculations, with concerns about how sig figs apply in this context.
  • Another participant suggests that the conversion to Kelvin should have 5 sig figs due to 273.15 being a known constant.
  • A later reply clarifies that all digits in 273.15 are exact, and discusses how to handle rounding in the addition process, emphasizing that the result should be rounded to 4 significant digits when calculating 1/T.
  • One participant expresses a perception that chemistry involves more rounding than physics, indicating a potential area of confusion when switching between subjects.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the application of significant figures in the discussed calculations, with differing opinions on how to handle rounding and the implications of constants in calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that significant figures may not be strictly adhered to in practical applications, suggesting that the context of the work may influence how seriously these rules are applied.

caljuice
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
I want to convert celsius to Kelvin using 273.15. I have a temperature 22.5 C. Then I want to find 1/T.

273.15+22.5 = 295.7 since 22.5 has the least decimal places?
But does 1/T = 1/(273.5+22.5) only have 3 sig figs since 22.5 is smallest sig fig? Or do I use 1/295.7?

Another sig fig problem I have is with graphing.

Moles vs time
.00020 115
.00060 325
.00100 581

Will the slope of the equation of the line be 2 sig figs or 3? My assumption is 2 because of the moles being 2 sig figs. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks, but didn't really clear my doubts.
Thinking it over, is the conversion of celsius to kelvin then 5 sig figs because 273.15 is a known constant?

What i don't get about 1/T is which number's sig fig I take because it's addition then division.
 
Addition and subtraction are slightly different.

All digits in 273.15 are exact.

Code:
 273.15
+ 22.5
-------
 295.65

After addition last 5 doesn't make sense, as we have no idea what it was added to. The result is 295.7

However, if you need 1/T, best approach is to calculate 1/295.65 and round it down to 4 SD, as you should never round down intermediate results.

Please note - significant figures are not used in a serious work when it comes to express uncertainty of the result, so you shouldn't treat them too seriously. Unless your report will be graded by some nitpicker detached from the lab reality, using 3SD should be OK.
 
Thanks that helps out. I find chem has a lot more rounding for each step than for physics. Going to be confused for awhile when i go back to physics next semester.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K