Sig figs introductory physics course

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem from an introductory physics course concerning the representation of velocity in terms of significant figures. The original poster questions the correct representation of the velocity value of 2/3 m/s when expressed with two significant figures.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to clarify whether 0.66 or 0.6 is the correct representation of the velocity in two significant figures, expressing disagreement with the online site's answer. Some participants discuss the significance of zeros in relation to significant figures, with one suggesting that 0.67 could also be a valid representation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of significant figures and their application to the problem. There is no explicit consensus on the correct answer, but various viewpoints are being shared.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the rules of significant figures, particularly in relation to leading zeros and the representation of decimal numbers. The original poster's brother's assignment context is noted, but specific details about the problem's requirements are not fully outlined.

Teachme
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
I was reading a problem my brother was assigned in his introductory physics course. The problem specifically asks to give the velocity from viewing a graph. The velocity is 2/3 m/s and it asked to give it in two significant figures. So I thought it would be .66, however the online site he was doing it on said this was incorrect and said the answer was 0.6. I do not agree with this since I was always led to believe the 0 is not a significant figure. Am I incorrect to say that the answer is .66 for two sig figs? I think they just made a mistake. Or am I missing something?

Thanks for reading
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I meant to say 0 is not significant figure when to the left of other numbers.
 
Teachme said:
I meant to say 0 is not significant figure when to the left of other numbers.
You are right, the zeros "to the left " indicate the magnitude. Writing the number in normal form, 2/3 = 0.66= 6.6 x 10-1 with two significant figures.
Imagine you have to give 2/30 with two significant figures. It is not 0.0!

ehild
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
I would call it 0.67.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Well, of course!

ehild
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K