Sign issue with the skew bending formula

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the sign convention in the skew bending formula for unsymmetric beams. The participants clarify that the absence of a minus sign in certain parts of the formula is due to the sign convention used for the bending moment vector, which is defined in the first quadrant between the X and Y principal axes. This results in opposite signs in the z direction when applying the superposition principle. A reference to a relevant academic resource is provided for further clarification on the topic.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of bending moment vectors in structural analysis
  • Familiarity with the superposition principle in mechanics
  • Knowledge of sign conventions in engineering mechanics
  • Basic concepts of unsymmetric beam behavior
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the skew bending formula for unsymmetric beams
  • Review the sign conventions used in structural analysis
  • Examine the application of the superposition principle in bending problems
  • Explore resources on beam theory, particularly focusing on asymmetric loading conditions
USEFUL FOR

Structural engineers, mechanical engineers, and students studying mechanics who seek to understand the complexities of bending moments in unsymmetric beams.

Amaelle
Messages
309
Reaction score
54
Good day !
I have an issue with the sign minus inside the skew bending (unsymmetric) formula
First we all know that the stress generated by the bending moment is the following:
flexural formula.jpg


and then after we have the formula
unsymmetric bending.png


I really don't understand why we don t have the sign minus in all the formula, because of the superposition principle? I'm really confused regarding that point
Many thanks in advance
 

Attachments

  • flexural formula.jpg
    flexural formula.jpg
    7.1 KB · Views: 1,421
  • unsymmetric bending.png
    unsymmetric bending.png
    56.1 KB · Views: 1,233
Engineering news on Phys.org
I am not certain of the topic ... I assume it is the beam that's asymmetric rather than the bending. E.g. as at http://courses.washington.edu/me354a/Unsym.pdf.
What looks like the same equation appears there on page 3. In that case it arises from the sign convention that happens to have been used for the axes and the bending moment. The bending moment vector is taken to be in the first quadrant between the X and Y principal axes. The cross product of that with the axis vectors will be into the page for one axis and out of the page for the other, i.e. opposite signs in the z direction.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Amaelle
thanks a lot!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K