Signicance of positive and negative frequencies?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the significance of positive and negative frequencies in the context of quantum field theory (QFT), specifically regarding the solutions to an inhomogeneous equation involving a Green's function. Participants explore the implications of these frequency components in the formulation of solutions for different time regimes.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the restriction of in- and out-solutions to positive- and negative-frequency parts, seeking clarification on this aspect.
  • Another participant asserts that the formula presented is inconsistent with the text, arguing that the positive-frequency solution cannot be valid at early times if it also includes the negative-frequency part.
  • A suggestion is made to consult a different QFT text for better clarity on the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the interpretation of the solutions and their frequency components, with no consensus reached on the validity of the original text's claims.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights potential inconsistencies in the formulation of solutions and the interpretation of frequency components, but does not resolve these issues.

pellman
Messages
683
Reaction score
6
Reading some QFT in which we are faced with inhomogeneous equation

(\partial^\mu \partial_\mu + m^2)\phi(x)=J(x)

The solution is given as

\phi(x)=\phi^{(+)}_{in}(x)+\phi^{(-)}_{out}(x)+i\int{d^4 x\Delta(x-x')J(x')

where \Delta is the appropriate Green's function. "in" means the solution for early times (when J vanishes) and "out" for late times (when J vanishes). The text states "where the superscripts (+) and (-) indicate the positive- and negative-frequency parts, respectively."

I don't understand why the in- and out-solutions are restricted to the positive- and negative-frequency parts.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bump. I'm still interested in this. Maybe someone is around now who can look at it.

Just one little bump. Any insight is appreciated.
 
The formula is inconsistent with the text. phi plus can't be the solution at early times, because the formula also inlcudes phi minus.

My recommendation: find a better QFT text.
 
Ok. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K