Significance of non-linear terms

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 3K views
anuradha
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
hi,
Do the addition of non-linear terms in action play any significant role in string theory??
if so, what is its significance in string cosmology?

---
anuradha
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dear anuradha,

Well the Nambu-Goto action is itself non-polynomial - because of the square-root. In the Nambu-Goto formalism, there is a topological term that we can add - the self-linking number. It is non-linear. But I have never seen a quantisation of the Nambu-Goto action with this knot theory topological term included.

On the other hand, I am not aware of any such topological term constructed from the X^mu, that measures knottedness in the Polyakov framework. Presumably if such a term exists - then it must be non-linear.

I would expect such terms to affect the compact extra dimensions because such terms imply highly non-trivial world-sheet topology and one must use the theory of Algebraic Surfaces and NOT merely Riemann Surfaces.

From the cosmology point of view - a new constraint on the compact extra dimensions will make the Landscape smaller...

Best Regards
Alwi
 
Demystifier said:
Are you talking about the action of the fundamental strings, or about the action of low-energy effective field theory that results from string theory?
thank you for your reply.
let me make it more clear!
see for eg: if the action is S=int{d^4x*(L_d+k*L_d^2)}, where L_d characterises the lagrangian density of the fermionic field and k being some constant(to make correct dimensionality)...by adding L_d^2 , S contains a non-linear term, right?
i am talking about such a field...does it hold any physical significance to string cosmology??
or does the L_d^2 term belong to string inspired cosmology??if so what may be its relevance??


hope you got my question!
-anuradha