Significant Digits for Longer Operations

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
jwj11
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Ok so I am having difficulty doing significant digits for longer operations (i.e. cosine law) where you also have square roots and squares (I know they are simply multiplications)

Homework Equations



c^2 = a^2 + b^2 - 2ab(cosC)

The Attempt at a Solution



Here are some example numbers. Please let me know if the answer is in correct significant digits.

c^2 = 22^2 + 65^2 - 2(22)(65)(cos119degrees) , c greater than or equal to 0
c=78

I think for cosine law what is really confusing me is how the cos119 converts into a very long decimal (weird fraction results)

And what about for sine law?

example

sin 119 degrees / 78.08 = sin theta / 65

theta = 47 degrees

Are the significant digits for both answers correct? Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not entirely sure I understand what you are concerned about, but you are permitted to use "excessive" significant figures in the course of making a calculation. (People do this all the time...) You simply have to report the final result to the correct number of significant figures.

You'll find in math courses, though, that people tend to be a lot less fussy about this. In a sense, this is because the values given in problems (for lengths, angles, and such) are assumed to be exact, and so have an infinite number of significant figures. You are then permitted to given the answer to whatever number of significant figures seems reasonable...

In fact, it is generally a good idea not to cut down the number of significant figures for an intermediate result. For some functions, this can lead to enormous errors in calculations. An example might be, for the law of cosines problem, using the cosine function for an angle of 89.5º, when the lengths of the sides are only given to two significant figures. Rounding the angle to 89º or 90º would lead to a huge misevaluation of the cosine of the actual given angle.