Significant Figures in Conversions: How to Apply the Rule in Physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter future_vet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Significant figures
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of significant figures in unit conversions within physics. Participants confirm the calculations for converting years to seconds and nanoseconds, emphasizing the importance of maintaining significant figures throughout the process. Specifically, the conversion from seconds to nanoseconds should yield 3.15 x 1016 nanoseconds in a year, correcting the initial miscalculation. The consensus highlights that when using conversion factors, the number of significant figures in the final answer should reflect the least precise measurement involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of significant figures in scientific calculations
  • Familiarity with unit conversions in physics
  • Basic knowledge of time measurement units (seconds, minutes, hours, days, years)
  • Ability to perform exponential notation calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the rules for significant figures in detail
  • Practice unit conversion problems involving time and other measurements
  • Learn about the implications of significant figures in scientific reporting
  • Explore the use of dimensional analysis in physics calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, educators teaching scientific measurement, and anyone interested in mastering the application of significant figures in calculations.

future_vet
Messages
169
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This is probably a ridiculous question for many of you, but I want to make sure I have understood the significant figures rule. I am putting this in the physics section because it's from my physics book.

The Attempt at a Solution



a) Seconds in 1.00 year:
1 year x 365 x 24 x 60 x 60 = 31,536,000 seconds in a year = 3.15 x10^7 sec/y.

b) Nanoseconds in 1.00 year:
(Seconds in a year) x (nanoseconds in a second)= 31,536,000x1x10^-9 = 0.031536 = 3.15 x 10^-2 nanoseconds in a year.

c) Years in 1.00 seconds:
1.00seconds x (1 minute/60 seconds) x (1 hour / 60 minutes) x (1 day/ 24 hours) x (1 year/365 days) = 3.17x 10^-8 year in 1.00 seconds.

Would this be correct?

Thank you so much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a) and c) looks good.
b) How many nano seconds is there in 1 second?
Is there really 3.15 x 10^(-2) nanosseconds i a year :rolleyes:?
 
Would it be 31536000 x 1second/(1x10^-9)=3.15 x 10^16 ?

Thanks for pointing this out and for your help!
 
future_vet said:
Would it be 31536000 x 1second/(1x10^-9)=3.15 x 10^16 ?

Thanks for pointing this out and for your help!

Yea, that's correct.
 
If you want to be strict with sig figs, your answer should only have 2 because youre multiplying by 24 and 60 in your work. However, conversion factors like that can conveniently be extended to 24.0 hours/1.00 day and 60.0 minutes/1.00 hour. Its no big deal for conversions, but if a measurement has 2 sig figs, your answer is only accurate to 2 sig figs
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K