Significant Figures in Conversions: How to Apply the Rule in Physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter future_vet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Significant figures
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of significant figures in unit conversions within the context of physics. Participants are examining how to correctly apply significant figures when converting between years, seconds, and nanoseconds.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to convert units while applying significant figures, presenting calculations for seconds in a year, nanoseconds in a year, and years in a second. Some participants question the accuracy of the conversion from seconds to nanoseconds, while others suggest reconsidering the significant figures based on the multiplication of conversion factors.

Discussion Status

Some participants have confirmed the correctness of specific calculations, while others are exploring the implications of significant figures in the context of the conversions. There is an ongoing dialogue about the appropriate treatment of conversion factors and their impact on significant figures.

Contextual Notes

Participants are discussing the rules of significant figures in relation to conversion factors, noting that strict adherence to significant figures may vary based on the context of the calculations.

future_vet
Messages
169
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This is probably a ridiculous question for many of you, but I want to make sure I have understood the significant figures rule. I am putting this in the physics section because it's from my physics book.

The Attempt at a Solution



a) Seconds in 1.00 year:
1 year x 365 x 24 x 60 x 60 = 31,536,000 seconds in a year = 3.15 x10^7 sec/y.

b) Nanoseconds in 1.00 year:
(Seconds in a year) x (nanoseconds in a second)= 31,536,000x1x10^-9 = 0.031536 = 3.15 x 10^-2 nanoseconds in a year.

c) Years in 1.00 seconds:
1.00seconds x (1 minute/60 seconds) x (1 hour / 60 minutes) x (1 day/ 24 hours) x (1 year/365 days) = 3.17x 10^-8 year in 1.00 seconds.

Would this be correct?

Thank you so much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a) and c) looks good.
b) How many nano seconds is there in 1 second?
Is there really 3.15 x 10^(-2) nanosseconds i a year :rolleyes:?
 
Would it be 31536000 x 1second/(1x10^-9)=3.15 x 10^16 ?

Thanks for pointing this out and for your help!
 
future_vet said:
Would it be 31536000 x 1second/(1x10^-9)=3.15 x 10^16 ?

Thanks for pointing this out and for your help!

Yea, that's correct.
 
If you want to be strict with sig figs, your answer should only have 2 because youre multiplying by 24 and 60 in your work. However, conversion factors like that can conveniently be extended to 24.0 hours/1.00 day and 60.0 minutes/1.00 hour. Its no big deal for conversions, but if a measurement has 2 sig figs, your answer is only accurate to 2 sig figs
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K