Simple Acceleration Equation Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter Linday12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving the calculation of distance using the acceleration equation under the influence of gravity. The original poster is working with the parameters of gravitational acceleration, initial velocity, and time to determine displacement and its interpretation as distance.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the implications of the negative sign in displacement and whether it should be omitted when expressing distance. They question if additional work is needed to clarify this distinction.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide feedback on the original poster's concerns, indicating that the negative sign is appropriate for displacement but suggesting that it can be omitted when discussing distance. There is an acknowledgment of the common confusion between distance and displacement in educational contexts.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses a desire for clarity on the definitions of distance and displacement, indicating a concern about the nuances often overlooked in high school physics education.

Linday12
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Simple Acceleration Equation Help

g=-9.80 m/s^2
t= 3.85
vi= 0.00 m/s
d=?
d=vi(t) + (1/2)gt^2

d=0 + (1/2)(-9.80m/s^2)((3.85s)^2)
=-72.6

I'm trying to find the distance. So, this d represents displacement. Since in this case, this is also the distance, would there be any other work to show the sign change, since the d would be going from a vector to a scalar? Or should I have modified this equation beforehand to show d as a scalar, and not have taken into account the gravities negative?

By the way, sorry, this must seem like a trivial matter really not worth time, but I hate not understanding it down to the tiny details. Thank you very much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The negative sign looks fine to me since the displacement is below the axis where you set your initial displacement to be zero.
 
Thanks. So, would I just leave out the negative when expressing it as a distance, and there would be no work needed?
 
That's right. Distance, by definition in physics, cannot be negative. However, most teachers I've come across with in high school tend to blur the distinction between distance and displacement in physics questions. If you want to be technical about it, leave out the negative sign and if the teacher has you bollocked for not putting in the negative sign, tell them the true meaning of distance in physics. :smile:
 
Haha, excellent. Thank you for the help! :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K