Simple circuit. Doubt with potentials

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around a circuit analysis problem from Halliday's textbook, specifically applying Kirchhoff's loop rule to determine voltage at specific points. The user incorrectly concludes that the voltages at the negative terminals of two voltage sources, E1 and E2, should be zero. Upon further examination, it is clarified that the user's equations are flawed, as the correct relationship derived from the problem states that i1 equals 2 times i2. The importance of using a structured problem statement is emphasized for clarity in circuit analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kirchhoff's loop rule
  • Basic knowledge of circuit analysis techniques
  • Familiarity with voltage sources and current relationships
  • Experience with Halliday's physics textbook concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Review Kirchhoff's laws in circuit analysis
  • Study voltage and current relationships in series and parallel circuits
  • Practice problem-solving using structured templates for circuit analysis
  • Explore common mistakes in circuit analysis and how to avoid them
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electrical engineering, educators teaching circuit analysis, and anyone seeking to improve their understanding of Kirchhoff's laws in practical applications.

srmico
Messages
16
Reaction score
1
Hey everyone!
I'm doing this simple exercice from Halliday's book, where I have to find some intensities at some points...

Ak_EHJr_OTYCppn_CSJOJDvk6_OFLtdnrj_N3_FFEu_A5_Kkmb_T.jpg


anyway after solving it, I realized that only looking at point b,and using Kirchoffs loop rule, the voltage at the negative of E1 and the voltage at the negative of E2(right) should be 0 in both points, then I get the equations:

Vb-0=i1*R1
Vb-0=i2*R1

So i1=+- i2 (the sign can be checked later).

Solving the problem the usual way, i1=2*i2 (solved in the book), which means my equations are wrong, could someone please explain why?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Sr, welcome to PF :smile: !

What happened to the template ? Its use is mandatory in PF. It forces you to write a clear problem statement, which now is deerly missing. And to list the variables, un- and known. Give it another try, help is on the way !
 
And when you restate your problem using the template, explain why you think those points should be at zero volts. It may seem obvious to you, but since it's wrong, it would be helpful to us to understand why you think it's right.
 

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K