Simple coefficient of performance question

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on evaluating the coefficient of performance (CoP) of two manufacturers for a cold room installation, with Company A at 8.5 and Company B at 9.7. A higher CoP indicates greater efficiency, leading to lower operational costs, but the values presented exceed the theoretical maximum derived from the Carnot cycle, suggesting potential discrepancies in their definitions. The conversation raises concerns about the accuracy of the CoP figures and the need for clarification from the manufacturers regarding their measurement methods. Additionally, it highlights the complexities in efficiency ratings, similar to the misleading efficiency claims of gas heaters in the UK. Ultimately, it is advised to question the companies about how they define and calculate their CoP to ensure alignment with the company's needs.
Joon
Messages
85
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Your company needs to install a cold room which will maintain a temperature of -15 degrees operating in a room where the temperature is 20 degrees. A new member of staff has considered the specifications of two manufacturers and asked you to check their figures. Explain what your decision would be.

Company A : coefficient of performance 8.5
Company B: coefficient of performance 9.7

Homework Equations


CoP = desired output / required output


The Attempt at a Solution


Does higher CoP simply mean that the efficiency of the cold room is higher?
I tried to use the temperature values given:
T(cold) / (T(hot)-T(cold)) = 7.37
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, higher COP means higher efficiency (and therefore less costs). However you calculated the COP based on the Carnot Cycle (which should perform at theoretically minimal cost):

$$COP = \frac{Q_0}{W} = \frac{Q_0}{Q_A-Q_0}=\frac{T_0\Delta S_0}{T_A\Delta S_A-T_0\Delta S_0}$$

Since in the Carnot process ##\Delta S_A =\Delta S_0## you obtain your formula

$$\frac{T_0}{T_A-T_0}=7.37$$

Since the companies offer cold rooms with higher COPs, maybe this is kind of a "trick question"...
 
The Carnot cycle based COP means the most efficient, right?
Since the companies offer cold rooms with higher COPs than Carnot COP, should I tell my staff not to work with these companies? (as it doesn't make sense or doesn't fit my company's demand)
 
General answer: higher COPs are better
Specific answer: something seems to be wrong with the COPs "offered" by the companies
 
  • Like
Likes Joon
I'd ask the companies how they define the COP.

Here in the UK we can buy gas heaters for houses that are 103% efficient because of the strange/hostoric way that 100% was defined.
 
CWatters said:
I'd ask the companies how they define the COP.

Here in the UK we can buy gas heaters for houses that are 103% efficient because of the strange/hostoric way that 100% was defined.

There is also the possibility that water or rooms are heated with the discharged heat to increase the benefit (and subsequently the COP) ...
 
stockzahn said:
There is also the possibility that water or rooms are heated with the discharged heat to increase the benefit (and subsequently the COP) ...

I believe its to do with the way the input power is measured. The efficiency is output power / input power. The output power into the circulating water can be measured easily but the input power depends on the energy density of the fuel and how that's measured. When they originally measured the calorific value of the fuel they ignored the latent heat of steam lost up the exhaust. These days boilers are condensing and recover that making some appear more than 100% efficient.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K