Solving Composite Functions: Understanding the Addition Rule for Division

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around confusion regarding the addition rule for composite functions, specifically in the context of the functions f(x) and g(x). Participants express uncertainty about the calculation involving the addition of 3 in the equation, questioning whether it should be divided instead. There is a consensus that the definitions provided for g(x) appear incorrect, suggesting a typo in the original problem statement. The correct interpretation should define g(x) as x^2/3 rather than 3g(x)=x^2. Feedback has been sent to the BBC regarding the potential error in their educational material.
Natasha1
Messages
494
Reaction score
9

Homework Statement


18.png
and
18.png


Find
18.png
,
18.png
and
18.png


2. The attempt at a solution

18.png
means work out
18.png
, then work out
18.png
for this value.

18.png


18.png


so
18.png


18.png


18.png


I do not understand why we add + 3 in line before last (2 x 16 + 3)
Should it not be divided by 3 as it is
18.png
which means 3 x g(x) = x^2

I am a little stuck on the reason why?
 

Attachments

  • 18.png
    18.png
    692 bytes · Views: 487
  • 18.png
    18.png
    761 bytes · Views: 510
  • 18.png
    18.png
    637 bytes · Views: 478
  • 18.png
    18.png
    630 bytes · Views: 491
  • 18.png
    18.png
    617 bytes · Views: 510
  • 18.png
    18.png
    637 bytes · Views: 501
  • 18.png
    18.png
    554 bytes · Views: 238
  • 18.png
    18.png
    818 bytes · Views: 247
  • 18.png
    18.png
    1 KB · Views: 235
  • 18.png
    18.png
    836 bytes · Views: 222
  • 18.png
    18.png
    1 KB · Views: 242
  • 18.png
    18.png
    734 bytes · Views: 235
  • 18.png
    18.png
    700 bytes · Views: 219
  • 18.png
    18.png
    761 bytes · Views: 223
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what they're doing with the ##+3## either but ##3g(x) = x^2## so ##g(x) = x^2/3## and ##g(4) = 16/3##, not 16. And ##f \circ g(4)## would be twice the value of ##g(4)##, definitely not 35.

Neither the calculation for ##g(4)## nor ##f[g(4)]## is consistent with the definitions you showed. Are you sure you have the right solution for the right question?
 
  • Like
Likes Natasha1
I suggest a typo in the question. It should read f(x)=2x+3 g(x)=x2.
It would be most unusual to define g implicitly as 3g(x)=x2 instead of g(x)=x2/3.
 
  • Like
Likes Natasha1
Spot on haruspex, thank you to you both!
 
Thank you! How did you do that?
 
That's great, well done!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
903
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K