Simple Derivation giving me a headache.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jimbo57
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation
Jimbo57
Messages
96
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Deriving http://www4d.wolframalpha.com/Calculate/MSP/MSP20181a00e6i82g005gag00005gb4c7hic8g2i3hi?MSPStoreType=image/gif&s=57&w=79&h=43


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



My attempt gives me:
-48/(x^2-16)^2 + 192x^2/(x^2-16)^3 via product rule

Wolfram alpha gives me this for an answer

http://www4d.wolframalpha.com/Calculate/MSP/MSP40371a00e53i06h6352d000061574g9ehi6a9958?MSPStoreType=image/gif&s=15&w=224&h=48

I can't seem to figure out how to match my answer with Wolfram, even though it's not a tough derivative. Am I maybe not simplifying enough?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
on Phys.org
Jimbo57 said:

Homework Statement


Deriving http://www4d.wolframalpha.com/Calculate/MSP/MSP20181a00e6i82g005gag00005gb4c7hic8g2i3hi?MSPStoreType=image/gif&s=57&w=79&h=43

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



My attempt gives me:
-48/(x^2-16)^2 + 192x^2/(x^2-16)^3 via product rule

Wolfram alpha gives me this for an answer

http://www4d.wolframalpha.com/Calculate/MSP/MSP40371a00e53i06h6352d000061574g9ehi6a9958?MSPStoreType=image/gif&s=15&w=224&h=48

I can't seem to figure out how to match my answer with Wolfram, even though it's not a tough derivative. Am I maybe not simplifying enough?

A simple trick that you can use to see if your answer actually matches up is to let x be a transcendental number like [itex]\pi[/itex] in your answer, then in Wolfram's. Since we're dealing with rational coefficients and exponents throughout, there is no way they can match up unless the answers are algebraically equivalent. They do match up in this case.

So it's just a matter of rearranging your equation. Try reexpressing -48/(x^2-16)^2 as [itex]-\frac{48(x^2 - 16)}{{(x^2 - 16)}^3}[/itex] for starters, then combine the numerators over a common denominator.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The answers are equivalent. In order to get it into the same form, you need to make a common denominator.
 
Ahh I see it now, thanks so much guys. Simple mistake, maybe I need a break...
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K