Simple economics question that I can't get a good answer to.

  • Thread starter Thread starter wasteofo2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Economics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the placement of price and quantity on the axes of economic graphs, specifically why price is typically represented on the Y-axis and quantity on the X-axis. Participants explore the implications of this convention, its historical context, and the interdependence of price and quantity in economic theory.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the convention of placing price on the Y-axis, suggesting that quantity may often be more dependent on price changes rather than the reverse.
  • Another participant attributes the convention to historical reasons, noting that demand and supply curves are based on price as a determining factor, while also acknowledging that analyses involving demand shifts are based on this axis arrangement.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes the mutual dependence of price and quantity, arguing that quantity can also determine price, citing examples such as market gluts and shortages.
  • Participants discuss the role of supply and demand as determining factors, suggesting that both price and quantity are results of these forces.
  • One participant elaborates on the derivation of demand and supply curves from utility and revenue maximization, reinforcing the idea that price is treated as the independent variable in theoretical models.
  • There is mention of the distinction between shifting curves and moving along curves, introducing the concepts of exogenous and endogenous variables in economic analysis.
  • Some participants note that while the theoretical models present a clear relationship, real-world scenarios may exhibit more complexity, particularly in oligopoly theory.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the independence and dependence of price and quantity, with some arguing for a historical basis for the convention while others emphasize their mutual interdependence. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that the relationship between price and quantity is not straightforward and may depend on various economic conditions and theoretical frameworks. The discussion highlights the complexity of economic modeling and the limitations of traditional representations.

wasteofo2
Messages
477
Reaction score
2
Why is it that when you're showing a graph in anything relating to economics, Price is on the Y axis and Quantity is on the X axis? Doesn't it seem that the quantity is dependent upon the price, rather than the opposite? I realize that neither one nor the other is totally independent or totally dependent, but it just seems that price shifts are far more commonly due to changes in quantity demanded than the other way around.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe it may have its 'historical' reasons. The demand and supply curves show the quantity demanded and supplied at any given price assuming all other variables hold constant; so you're kind of right, price is the determining factor. But as long as there is consistency, it should alright, but note that a lot of other analyses including demand shifts and etc are based on Y(price)-X(qnt). Also, the amount of products sold can be determined by the more familiar 'area under the curve' instead of 'area to the left of the curve', which may be more appealing in some ways.
 
Actually price and quantity are mutual variables; each can be determined by the other. Quantity can determine price. For example if there is a glut of widgets, the price of widgets will fall, and if there is a widget shortage it will rise. This is the de Beers philosophy in marketing diamonds.
 
On a supply-demand curve it's supply and demand that are the determining factors, both quantity and price are results.
 
It's historical. In consumer theory you derive the individual demand curve by maximizinging your utility function given prices and income. So price is the independent variable, quantity the dependent. In 'the theory of firm' you get the individual supply curves from maximizing your revenue function where you adjust quantity by given factor prices and given price of the good you produce.

So the agents in crazy neoclassical complete market micro are always price takers. Given some prices, income, costs- what quantity would you choose? That gives the curves. Add them all together, you get the aggregate supply and demand curves.

On a supply-demand curve it's supply and demand that are the determining factors, both quantity and price are results.

Well, there is shifting the curves and moving along the cuves. Or in eco lingo, exogeneous and endogeneous variables.
You first need demand and supply curves to begin with. They are formed in micro theory as described above.

Actually price and quantity are mutual variables; each can be determined by the other.
Only in the real world, not in your average microeconomics textbook.
Allright, in oligopoly theory you have this obvious interdependence, but the nice demand and supply curves are gone.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
16K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 133 ·
5
Replies
133
Views
28K
Replies
19
Views
10K