Simple Harmonic Motion - basic question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A mass on a spring undergoing simple harmonic motion with amplitude A completes three full periods, resulting in a displacement of zero, as it returns to its starting position. To calculate the actual distance traveled during this time, one must consider the total distance covered in each half-period. The distance traveled in three periods is equal to six times the amplitude, as the mass moves from the maximum displacement to the equilibrium position and back in each half-period.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of simple harmonic motion principles
  • Familiarity with the equation x(t) = A cos(wt)
  • Knowledge of amplitude and equilibrium position
  • Basic grasp of periodic motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concepts of amplitude and equilibrium in simple harmonic motion
  • Learn about the relationship between period and distance traveled in oscillatory systems
  • Explore graphical representations of simple harmonic motion, such as sine and cosine waves
  • Investigate the effects of varying mass and spring constants on simple harmonic motion
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of oscillatory motion and its calculations.

oakk
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A mass on a spring undergoes simple harmonic motion with amplitude A.
a) In a time equal to three periods, what is the magnitude of the displacement of the mass?
b) In a time equal to three periods, what actual distance did it travel?

In the first part, I was at first trying to use an equation but realized that wasn't necessary. If it completes three full periods, it ends up at the same position it started at.

But I don't understand how to calculate the second part. I was trying to use the equation x(t)=Acos(wt) to find the distance traveled, but I don't know t, nor do I know if this is even the right method for solving this. How am I supposed to know the actual distance traveled?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
oakk said:
But I don't understand how to calculate the second part. I was trying to use the equation x(t)=Acos(wt) to find the distance traveled, but I don't know t, nor do I know if this is even the right method for solving this. How am I supposed to know the actual distance traveled?
It's simpler than all that. Just imagine the mass bouncing up and down. Start at the top. Where is it? (With respect to the equilibrium position.) After half a period, where is it? How far has it traveled? After 1 period, where is it? And so on.
 
Ah, ok. That makes much more sense. I think my problem is that I wasn't actually envisioning the mass with its simple up/down motion, but rather focusing too much on the sine waves. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
995