Simple Harmonic Motion - Potential and Kinetic Energy?

meganw
Messages
96
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 2.00 kg mass vibrates according to the equation x = 0.470 cos 8.36t, where x is in meters, and t is in seconds. Assume that x = 0.29 m.

(a) Determine the amplitude.
.470
(b) Determine the frequency.
1.331
(c) Determine the total energy.

(d) Determine the kinetic energy.

e) Determine the potential energy.

I did the first two parts (a-b), but I'm stuck on c,d & e, the questions about the Energy of the spring.

Homework Equations



PE = .5kx^2

and

KE = .5KA^2

F/x=k

The Attempt at a Solution



I've tried these 3 multiple times and I keep getting them wrong. One thing I'm not sure of, is is "x" the amplitude? I have been plugging in .29 for the "x" and .47 for the "A", but just curious if this is the reason I'm getting these wrong.

I would think, that according to these formulas, KE+PE=TOTAL ENERGY, and I thought I was doing them right. I'm at my wits end.
 
Last edited:
on Phys.org
meganw said:

Homework Equations



PE = .5kx^2
Good.

and

KE = .5KA^2
Not good. (This implies that the KE doesn't change!)


I've tried these 3 multiple times and I keep getting them wrong. One thing I'm not sure of, is is "x" the amplitude?
No. "x" is displacement from equilibrium.
I have been plugging in .29 for the "x" and .47 for the "A", but just curious if this is the reason I'm getting these wrong.
These are correct.

I would think, that according to these formulas, KE+PE=TOTAL ENERGY,
Absolutely. What's the total energy?

Hint: Since total energy doesn't change, pick the easiest position to calculate PE + KE.
 
K.E + P.E = total energy
[tex]\frac{1}{2}mv^2+\frac{1}{2}kx^2=\frac{1}{2}kA^2[/tex]
They usually give you that equation on formula sheets.
 
Does Ke=.5mv^2?

I don't know V, and I can't use w=v/r because I don't know R.

ALSO:

I tried to find Total Energy when PE is maxed out and v=0, but I got it wrong. I did

Total Energy=.5((9.8*2)/(.29))*(.29)^2
thats .5 * k * x^2

And Snazzy-I tried .5KA^2 as my total energy and got 2.986 and that's wrong...
 
The total energy is only given by [tex]\frac{1}{2}kx^2[/tex] only if [tex]x=A[/tex]

You find A by looking at the equation of the motion because SHM follows the equation:

[tex]x(t)=Acos(\omega t+\phi)[/tex]

Then you can find the potential energy at x=0.29m and then the kinetic energy at that point since you now have the total energy and the potential energy.
 
But I can't find KE because I don't know V and I can't find v using W because I don't have R...

I TRIED TO FIND PE AND GOT IT WRONG:

F=kx

x=.29
F=9.8*2
k=67.5862

SO

PE=.5(67.5862)(.29^2)
=2.842

Thank you so much for your help on this!
wrong
 
Last edited:
You don't need V or R or whatever to find the kinetic energy. You can use the fact that KE + PE = total energy
 
Well, x is not equal to A. So I guess I can't use the fact that .5kA^2 is total, and I keep getting PE wrong. :(
 
You get PE wrong because your value of k is wrong. F = kx at equilibrium, but x=0.29 is not the distance the spring has stretched at its equilibrium state. They usually give you the equation:

[tex]\omega =\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}[/tex]

And you CAN use the fact that [tex]\frac{1}{2}kA^2[/tex] is the total energy because A is GIVEN TO YOU IN THE EQUATION OF THE FUNCTION. The reason you got it wrong is because your value of k is wrong.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Okay, I tried it using x=.470 for my equation of the value of k, and I get k=41.7

but then I still get the wrong answer for PE...=1.753
 
  • #11
I don't know why you're using the amplitude to find the value of k, use [tex]\omega[/tex] and the mass to find the value of k as shown in the equation above. The spring does not stretch to its amplitude at equilibrium, nor does it stretch to the value of x the question gives you.
 
  • #12
I GOT THEM RIGHT! =)

Thanks, you were SO helpful! I didn't realize that you can't always use the equation of F=-kx to find k!

I'm really thankful and grateful that you stayed online and helped me through each step. Thanks again, you're a really good person. =)
 
  • #13
meganw said:
I GOT THEM RIGHT! =)

Thanks, you were SO helpful! I didn't realize that you can't always use the equation of F=-kx to find k!

I'm really thankful and grateful that you stayed online and helped me through each step. Thanks again, you're a really good person. =)

You can always use F=-k x at two conditions: that the F you use is the force exerted by the spring and that the x you use is the displacement of the mass from the equilibrium position. I am not sure why you concluded that you can't always use that equation but I wanted to point that out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K