Simple Introductory Problem that's giving me troubles

  • Thread starter Thread starter ChaseRLewis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Introductory
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a physics problem involving the thermal energy transfer from a burst of 1014 electrons, each with an energy of 15 MeV, to a copper target block weighing 100 grams. The specific heat of copper is given as 0.09 cal/g K. The correct temperature rise calculated should be 6.3 K, but the initial calculations were incorrect due to a misunderstanding of the notation for the number of electrons. The error was identified as a misinterpretation of 1014 as 1014, leading to incorrect results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermal energy transfer principles
  • Familiarity with specific heat capacity calculations
  • Basic knowledge of particle physics, specifically electron energy
  • Ability to interpret scientific notation in calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the concept of energy transfer in thermodynamics
  • Study specific heat calculations in different materials
  • Learn about the conversion of MeV to calories for particle physics
  • Explore common pitfalls in scientific notation and unit conversions
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, particularly those tackling thermodynamics and particle physics problems, as well as educators looking for examples of common calculation errors in energy transfer scenarios.

ChaseRLewis
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



1-3 A burst of 1014 electrons accelerated to an energy of 15MeV per electron is stopped in a copper target block of mass 100g. If the block is thermally insulated, what is its temperature rise? The specific heat of copper is 0.09 cal/g K

Homework Equations



m*Cp*dT = dQ

The Attempt at a Solution



Assume 100% of KE transfer to heat.
Negligible mass increase.

(100g)*(.09 cal/g K) dT = 1014 electrons * 15 MeV/electron * 2.6144*10^(-13) cal/MeV

The solution is supposed to be 6.3 K but what I have above isn't even remotely close (way too small). I'm trying to guide myself through a special relativity book and given this is was the only problem in the beginning I couldn't get to matchup I feel a bit awkward posting it because it seems so simple : /.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Probably a typo? If you take the number of electrons as 1014 and divide by 2.6.. instead of multiplying (you did a calculation mistake, it seems), the answer comes out to be ~6.3 K.
 
Sourabh N said:
Probably a typo? If you take the number of electrons as 1014 and divide by 2.6.. instead of multiplying (you did a calculation mistake, it seems), the answer comes out to be ~6.3 K.

Ah thanks it was the 10^14 rather than 1014 : / got to get used to these ebook prints.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K