Simple math rules seem contradictory

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Holocene
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rules
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the expression x^8 - 16 and the perceived contradictions in mathematical rules regarding factoring and taking square roots. Participants explore the validity of breaking down the expression into radicals and the implications of doing so, touching on concepts like the difference of squares and the distribution of square roots over subtraction.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the expression x^8 - 16 and suggests that mathematical rules seem contradictory when attempting to factor it using square roots.
  • Another participant correctly factors the expression as (x^4 + 4)(x^4 - 4) and questions the necessity of breaking it into radicals.
  • Several participants assert that the square root does not distribute over subtraction, emphasizing that individual roots cannot be taken from the terms in the expression.
  • One participant provides an example involving the Pythagorean theorem to illustrate the error in taking individual roots, stating that it leads to incorrect results.
  • A later reply suggests that the correct approach involves considering the sign of the radicand and using absolute values in the decomposition.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the validity of breaking down the expression into radicals, with some asserting that it is incorrect while others provide alternative perspectives on how to approach the problem. No consensus is reached regarding the perceived contradictions in mathematical rules.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding the distribution of square roots and the implications of factoring expressions, but do not resolve these issues. The discussion reflects various assumptions about mathematical operations and their applications.

Holocene
Messages
237
Reaction score
0
Simple math rules seem contradictory... :(

Consider this simple expression:

[tex]x^8 - 16[/tex]

If we wanted to write this expression as the product of two factors, we could start with something simple like this:

[tex]\sqrt{x^8 -16}[/tex] . [tex]\sqrt{x^8 -16}[/tex]

From that, we would simply get this:

[tex](x^4 - 4)(x^4 - 4)[/tex]

This is wrong though, as it does not equal the original expression. Multiplying two negative values will result in a positive value for 16. This is false, as the original exprsssion clearly has a negative value for 16.

So, one of the signs in [tex](x^4 - 4)(x^4 - 4)[/tex] must chnage to a possitive sign.

It just seem to me like, at times, some of the mathematical rules seem contradictory.

Or am I wrong in that you cannot take the individual roots of the terms in an expression?

Anyone information would be greatly appreciated?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Actually,

[tex]x^8 -16 = (x^4 +4)(x^4 -4)[/tex]

What is the point of breaking the expression into radicals?
 
what is exactly right. The only problem with his/her answer is that it wasn't explicit enough.

Holocene said:
Or am I wrong in that you cannot take the individual roots of the terms in an expression?

Holocene, what you did in the original post was wrong. The square root does not distribute over subtraction. You cannot take individual roots of the terms in an expression. Example: Consider the Pythagorean triple [itex]3^2+4^2=5^2[/itex], so [itex]\sqrt{5^2-4^2} = 3[/itex]. Taking roots of individual terms as was done in the OP would lead to 5-4=1, obviously not 3.
 
D H said:
Holocene, what you did in the original post was wrong. The square root does not distribute over subtraction. You cannot take individual roots of the terms in an expression. Example: Consider the Pythagorean triple [itex]3^2+4^2=5^2[/itex], so [itex]\sqrt{5^2-4^2} = 3[/itex]. Taking roots of individual terms as was done in the OP would lead to 5-4=1, obviously not 3.

So many students make this mistake!
 
Holocene said:
Consider this simple expression:

[tex]x^8 - 16[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt{x^8 -16}[/tex] . [tex]\sqrt{x^8 -16}[/tex]

[tex](x^4 - 4)(x^4 - 4)[/tex]

This is wrong though, as it does not equal the original expression. Multiplying two negative values will result in a positive value for 16. This is false, as the original exprsssion clearly has a negative value for 16.

So, one of the signs in [tex](x^4 - 4)(x^4 - 4)[/tex] must chnage to a possitive sign.

It just seem to me like, at times, some of the mathematical rules seem contradictory.

Or am I wrong in that you cannot take the individual roots of the terms in an expression?

Anyone information would be greatly appreciated?

It should be the difference of squares, so it should have (a+b)(a-b).
Your breaking apart of the expression into radical was wrong. So no, the mathematical rules do not contradict each other.
 
The correct radicand decomposition is:
[tex]x^{8}-16=sign(x^{8}-16)\sqrt{|x^{8}-16|}\sqrt{|x^{8}-16|}[/tex]
 
wow no wonder i couldn't figure out how he reduced the roots
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K