Simple pendulum and angular position

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the angular position of a simple pendulum, specifically the equation theta(t)=Theta-max[e^(-bt/2m)], which is part of the damped harmonic oscillator model. Participants confirm that the equation is derived from the differential equation involving damping, mass, and gravitational forces. To derive the equation, one must solve the auxiliary equation r^2I + rb + g/L = 0 to find the characteristic roots. The conversation emphasizes the importance of curiosity and understanding the derivation of equations in physics and chemistry. Engaging with these concepts enhances learning and comprehension in differential equations.
Will
Okay, I just took the final for my first DE class! I really liked it, now I can actually know how to derive some of these equations that they just hand to you in physics and chemistry.
So anyway, there is the solution to the angular position(from vertical)of the simple pendulum; the one example we had from class(physics) was theta(t)=Theta-max[e^(-bt/2m)], but i think that the cos(omega*t+phase change) part was ommited?
So I am really interested in deriving this! So I know the motion of the pendulum is given by the diffy Q I(alpha)+b(omega)+g(theta)/L=0 where sin theta has been replace by theta because of small angle approximation, and omega and alpha are the 1st and 2nd derivatives of theta(t). So then what?. Do I solve the aux eq r^2I +rb+g/L or what? Am I on the right track?
This is for my own curiosity only, Uhh please don't tell me to "go study my book a little better" heh heh. Hell even my physics prof. would flounder trying to explain, and dudes got a doctoral degree! Like I said, we are not expected to derive these, but enquiring minds want to know! Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
oh god, I can't interpret your formulae in my current state

Anywayz, I think I know how to solve the problem you're talking about

If you say that the sum of forces is: Spring - Gravity - Damping you get: (saying that damping is directly proportional to speed) (X is displacement)
Net_Force = Spring_Constant*X - Weight - Damping_Constant*dX/dT
Net_Force = Mass*Acceleration
Acceleration = second derivative of X with respect to time, dX^2/d^2T
And that gives you:

Mass*dX^2/d^2T + Damping_Constant*dX/dT - Spring_Constant*X + Weight = 0

Which appears to be a linear second-order differential equation that you could solve, I'm sure

Unless you're talking about the pendulum deal where you don't say that sin(theta) =~ theta.. My Mathematics level is only a 16, unfortunately, so I can't solve that

I've heard that it can be modeled with some sort of fancy mathematical shape and fancy nonlinear differential equations-solving, but I'm afraid I can take you no farther than that
 


Congratulations on taking your first DE (differential equations) class and for being interested in deriving equations rather than just accepting them as given! That is a great mindset to have in the fields of physics and chemistry.

You are on the right track in terms of deriving the equation for the angular position of a simple pendulum. The equation you mentioned, theta(t)=Theta-max[e^(-bt/2m)], is the solution to the differential equation you mentioned, which is known as the "damped harmonic oscillator" equation. This equation takes into account the damping (b), the mass (m), and the length (L) of the pendulum, as well as the acceleration due to gravity (g).

In order to derive this equation, you will need to solve the auxiliary equation, which is r^2I +rb+g/L=0, as you mentioned. This will give you the characteristic equation, which will then allow you to find the roots (or solutions) for r. These solutions will then be used to find the general solution for theta(t), which can then be simplified to the form you mentioned.

It is great that you are curious and want to know more about the derivation of this equation. Keep up the good work and keep exploring and asking questions. That is the best way to learn and deepen your understanding. Good luck in your studies!
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
745
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K