Simple Projectile Motion Problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a baseball hit at a speed of 60.0 m/s at an angle of 30 degrees to the horizontal. Participants are tasked with determining the time the ball is in the air and the distance it travels, while considering the effects of gravity on its vertical motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of vector components to analyze the motion, with some calculating horizontal and vertical velocities. Questions arise regarding the assumption of vertical displacement being zero and the implications of this assumption on the problem's setup.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the assumptions necessary to solve the problem, particularly regarding the initial height of the ball when hit. Some participants suggest that the ball is hit from ground level, while others express uncertainty about the wording of the question and its implications.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem may require assumptions about the initial height of the ball, as the wording is considered ambiguous. The discussion reflects a need for clarity on the setup to proceed with calculations.

PinguNinja
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Baseball is hit at 60.0m/s at an angle of 30 degrees to the horizontal. Assuming the field is level find:
Time ball was in air
How long it was in the air
How far did it go
Given
Assume up is +ve
Calculated data within brackets
Horizontal
v=(52m/s)
d=
t=
Vertical
vi=(30m/s)
vf=
a=-9.8m/s
d=
t=
Ball
v=60.0m/s[Forward30Up]

Homework Equations


sinθ=opp/hyp
cosθ=adj/hyp
d=ut+0.5at^2
v=d/t

The Attempt at a Solution


Assume (variable)(h) means a horizontal variable and (variable)(v) means the vertical variable.
So i drew out the vector diagram for the ball, with v(ball)=v(h)+v(v), knowing angle is 30
Using sine and cosine i was able to determine the values for v(h)=52m/s and v(v)=30m/s.
(Calculated info written in the givens within brackets)
So now I am stuck...I am not given enough information to determine any other variables, I think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi PinguNinja! Welcome to PF! :wink:
PinguNinja said:
Horizontal
v=(52m/s)
d=
t=
Vertical
vi=(30m/s)
vf=
a=-9.8m/s
d=
t=

Yes, that's fine so far. :smile:

Now use the standard constant acceleration equation in the vertical direction, to find t.

(the displacement d = 0 :wink:)​
 
Perhaps this is a silly question, but why would the displacement be zero? Were the displacement be zero, would that not mean that the ball is at the start position? (Start position being where the ball is hit). If we were to set the point it hit the ground to be zero, then would we not run into the problem where we do not know at what height the start position should be?

d=ut+0.5at^2
0=30t+0.5(-9.8)t^2
-30t=0.5(-9.8)t^2
6.1=t
 
Assuming the ball is initially on the ground (call this h = 0) and it is hit with a bat at an angle of 30 degrees above the horizontal we can say that the displacement is 0 becasue the ball travels up in the air to its max height (call this h = h_{max}; it then falls to the ground returning to h = 0 - so the displacement of the ball is 0 (it returned to the height from which it was hit).

If you were to hold the ball above the ground at some arbitrary height (say, h = h_{o} it would rise to its max height h_{max}, then fall to its original height h_{o} and continue falling until it hit the ground. In this case the total displacement would be - h_{o} because the change in its position would be \Delta h = h_{final} - h_{initial} = 0 - h_{o}.
 
Alright. So since it appears that the question is not doable without assumptions (i assume? :wink:) Then I will assume that the ball hits the bat when the bat is touching the ground :3.
 
That seems like the best assumption to make, in my opinion. :)
 
Hi PinguNinja! :smile:

(just got up :zzz:)

Yes, I agree with Tsunoyukami :smile: … the question is badly worded. :frown:

However, you can work it out from …
PinguNinja said:
Assuming the field is level …

clearly this was put there for some purpose,

and the writer obviously thought he was saying that the vertical displacement was zero! :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K