Simple proportionality question

  • Thread starter Thread starter hmvince
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proportionality
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
hmvince
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, simple question really:
Given the equation
Code:
v = (Gm/r)[SUP]1/2[/SUP]
Is it wrong to say
Code:
v is inversely proportional to r
Or do you have to say
Code:
v is inverslely proportional to r[SUP]1/2[/SUP]
 
on Phys.org
hey hmvince! :wink:
hmvince said:
Is it wrong to say
Code:
v is inversely proportional to r

yes! :smile:
Or do you have to say
Code:
v is inverslely proportional to r[SUP]1/2[/SUP]

you don't have to say "inverslely"! o:)
 
I thought you did have to, cos if you don't it means v increases with r, instead of v decreases with r.
Do you mean to say this?:
v is directly proportional to r-1/2?

Looking at your number of posts and recognitions I don't mean to say you are wrong, just trying to figure it out for myself!
 
hi hmvince! :wink:

yes, it's always best to ask until you're sure

no point in losing even one mark in an exam by knowing the maths but not using the generally-accepted phrase! :smile:

you can say

v is proportional to r-1/2

or

v is inversely proportional to r1/2

or

v and r-1/2 are proportional

or

v and r1/2 are inversely proportional​

(and you don't need "directly", since it adds no information … but it isn't actually wrong)