Simple question concerning unitary transformation

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the correct form of transforming an operator under infinitesimal unitary transformations, specifically whether it should be U^-1AU or UAU^-1. It highlights that both forms are valid depending on the definition of the unitary transformation U, which can act on kets or bras. The distinction is noted to be superficial, as unitary matrices form a group and both U and U^-1 are unitary. However, the choice of U affects how the operator is represented in the new basis, leading to different expressions for the matrix elements. Ultimately, the transformation's definition is crucial for correctly applying it to quantum states and operators.
M. next
Messages
380
Reaction score
0
Is the transformation of an operator under INFINITESIMAL unitary transformation, U^-1AU or UAU^-1?? I saw that two books defined it differently?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember that the unitary matrices form a group. So if U is a unitary matrix, then U^-1 is also a unitary matrix. Therefore, the distinction is superficial depending on which transformation you want to define as your U.
 
So it doesn't matter?
 
Well, it does matter a little bit. If you define U to be the unitary transformation that transforms kets |a>, then U^-1 will be the unitary transformation that makes the same transformation on the bras <b|. Using this, one should see that the matrix element <b|S|a> under a transformation goes to <b|U^-1SU|a> which means that the matrix S'=U^-1SU is the matrix that represents the operator in this new basis. If I defined U the opposite way, as U is the transformation on bras, then I get the other definition.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K