Simple showing inverse of matrix also upper triangular

  • Thread starter Thread starter snrwww
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Matrix
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on demonstrating that the inverse of a 3x3 upper triangular matrix with a non-zero determinant is also upper triangular. The explicit computation of the inverse involves calculating the adjugate matrix and dividing it by the determinant. The adjugate for the given matrix is derived, with corrections made to ensure accuracy in the calculations. Participants clarify the elements of the adjugate, particularly focusing on the upper right corner determinant. The conclusion emphasizes that the inverse retains the upper triangular form, confirming the initial assertion.
snrwww
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to show that A be a 3 x 3 upper triangular matrix with non-zero determinant . Show by explicit computation that A^{-1}(inverse of A) is also upper triangular. Simple showing is enough for me.

\begin{bmatrix}\color{blue}a & \color{blue}b & \color{blue}c \\0 & \color{blue}d & \color{blue}e \\ 0 & 0 &\color{blue}f\end{bmatrix}

Can someone explain and show it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can explicitly calculate the inverse as

##A^{-1} = \frac{1}{det A} \cdot (((-1)^{i+j} det A_{ij})_{i,j})^t = \frac{1}{det A} \cdot ((-1)^{i+j} det A_{ij})_{j,i}##

where ##A_{ij}## denotes the matrix you get from ##A## when you cross off the i-th row and j-th column. ##B^t## denotes the transposed matrix of a matrix B.

(compare: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse_Matrix Sorry, I haven't found an the English version of it.)
 
The inverse of a matrix is its adjugate divided by its determinant. The "adjugate" of this matrix is
\left|\begin{array}{ccc}df & -bf & be- cf \\ 0 & af & ae \\ 0 & 0 & ad \end{array}\right|
 
HallsofIvy said:
The inverse of a matrix is its adjugate divided by its determinant. The "adjugate" of this matrix is
\left|\begin{array}{ccc}df & -bf & be- cf \\ 0 & af & ae \\ 0 & 0 & ad \end{array}\right|
almost
 
Right- I missed a negative sign:
\left|\begin{array}{ccc}df & -bf & be- cf \\ 0 & af & -ae \\ 0 & 0 & ad \end{array}\right|.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Right- I missed a negative sign:
\left|\begin{array}{ccc}df & -bf & be- cf \\ 0 & af & -ae \\ 0 & 0 & ad \end{array}\right|.
I meant (1,3). It has to be ##be - cd## instead as long as I'm not totally confused. But to be honest: beside laziness that's why I shirked from it. I'd have messed it up even more and would have had to perform the control calculation.
 
The "upper right corner" of the adjugate is \left|\begin{array}{cc}b & c \\ d & e\end{array}\right |= be- cd, Yes, you are right.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K