Simple Uniform Acceleration Question

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
7 replies · 5K views
wwwwww
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hello new user here. I'm utterly confused about uniform acceleration as my book does a very poor job (in my opinion) of explaining it. Could somebody please help me with this problem?

A spaceship far from any star or planet experiences uniform acceleration from 65.0m/s to 162.0m/s in 10.0s. How far does it move?


Homework Equations


Vf=Vi+at
d=Vit+.5at

The Attempt at a Solution


Well I tried to use the equation d=(Vf+Vi)/2 but I checked my answer with my teacher's answers and the answers were way different. I think it's because the problem uses uniform acceleration and not constant acceleration.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
wwwwww said:

Homework Statement


Hello new user here. I'm utterly confused about uniform acceleration as my book does a very poor job (in my opinion) of explaining it. Could somebody please help me with this problem?

A spaceship far from any star or planet experiences uniform acceleration from 65.0m/s to 162.0m/s in 10.0s. How far does it move?


Homework Equations


Vf=Vi+at
d=Vit+.5at

The Attempt at a Solution


Well I tried to use the equation d=(Vf+Vi)/2 but I checked my answer with my teacher's answers and the answers were way different. I think it's because the problem uses uniform acceleration and not constant acceleration.

why not use the formula

d = 1/2(Vf+Vi).t

You seem to have forgotten there is a time factor in the formula.


Of course you could easily use the first two you quoted. Use the first to find the acceleration, then the second to use that acceleration to find the distance.

Final point: Uniform acceleration and Constant acceleration are the same thing.
 
Uniform acceleration and constant acceleration are the same thing, it means that the acceleration remains at a fixed value throughout the course of motion.

The problem is giving you two velocities, since it is stated that the acceleration is constant, you must compute the acceleration from the two velocities.

So you need to ask yourself, what is acceleration? It is the change in velocity over a period of time. This should give you everything you need to answer the question. :]

EDIT: In physics, you shouldn't just try to throw a formula at things, but rather reason it through and make sense of the formulas.
 
PeterO said:
why not use the formula

d = 1/2(Vf+Vi).t

You seem to have forgotten there is a time factor in the formula.


Of course you could easily use the first two you quoted. Use the first to find the acceleration, then the second to use that acceleration to find the distance.

Final point: Uniform acceleration and Constant acceleration are the same thing.

The formula that PeterO threw at this problem is simply another way to write
displacement = (average velocity) ✕ time .​
In the case of uniform acceleration, it's true that
(average velocity) = 1/2(Vf + Vi).​
 
Oh thanks for the help. I got 1135 m, and the answer in the book is 1140 which I guess is close enough.
 
wwwwww said:
Oh thanks for the help. I got 1135 m, and the answer in the book is 1140 which I guess is close enough.

Your answer is correct. If that is the answer printed in the book it is wrong.
If they were trying to express to 3 significant figures it should have been 1.14 x 103 m or perhaps 1.14 km
 
SammyS said:
The formula that PeterO threw at this problem is simply another way to write
displacement = (average velocity) ✕ time .​
In the case of uniform acceleration, it's true that
(average velocity) = 1/2(Vf + Vi).​

I didn't just throw in that equation.
There are 5 equations covering uniformly accelerated motion. wwwwww had listed 2 of them, I brought in a 3rd, more directly applicable, one and there are 2 more to go, but neither of them has direct application to this question.

Besides when wwwwww had listed d = (Vf + Vi)/2 it looked like a mis-quoting of the equation of motion I referred to.