Simple Vector Boat Problem, Conceptual Misunderstanding

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on a conceptual misunderstanding regarding the calculation of a boat's crossing time across a river. The original poster believes that the boat's distance traveled should be calculated using the Pythagorean theorem due to downstream drift. However, it is clarified that the current's influence on the boat's velocity does not affect the crossing time when the boat is angled correctly. The correct approach involves using vector components to determine the time based on the boat's velocity relative to the water. Ultimately, both methods can yield the correct crossing time, provided the appropriate speeds are used.
WRS
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Yes
Relevant Equations
Pythagoras, Trigonometry
Hi there,

I have attached the problem I'm working with.

I believe I must have the wrong idea of how to approach this question.

My issue is with the stated width and calculating how long the boat will take to cross the river.

It's using width; 110m and the boats velocity to determine how long the boat will take to cross the river. Later in the section it states that the boat will have drifted 71m downstream.

My assumption is that if the river was 110m (shore to shore) and the boat drifted 71m down stream the actual distance traveled by the boat would be found using c^2 = a^2 + b^2

Distance traveled = 110^2 + 71^2
Distance traveled = 130.9m (1.dp)

And therefore the time taken to travel would be founding using width 130.9m, rather than 110m?

Thank you very much
 

Attachments

  • physicsboat.PNG
    physicsboat.PNG
    110.2 KB · Views: 258
Physics news on Phys.org
But the speed of the boat along the diagonal path is increased by the current. That increase is exactly enough to not affect the crossing time. If you try to fight the current and cross directly by angling upstream, your crossing time will increase. This of course can all be shown most easily using vectors.
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi
Like @hutchphd said, working it through with vectors might help to better your understanding. All we are really saying is that, in a frame fixed to the shore,

##\Delta \mathbf{r} = \mathbf{v} \Delta t##

Where ##\mathbf{v} = \mathbf{v}_{BS}##. From this you can get two other component equations,

##\Delta y = v_y \Delta t##
##\Delta x = v_x \Delta t##

Luckily in this case it's easy to see from a diagram that ##v_y## is just that of the boat with respect to the water, and ##v_x## is the velocity of the river (make sure to insert appropriate negative signs depending on how you setup your coordinate axes!).

So the easiest way to get the time is just to use ##\Delta t = \frac{\Delta y}{v_y}##, as your textbook did. But you can do your method also, just so long as you use the right speed! For instance, take the magnitude of both sides of the first equation I wrote:

##||\Delta \mathbf{r}|| = ||\mathbf{v}|| \Delta t##

So now ##||\Delta \mathbf{r}||## is the full (##a^2 + b^2##) distance, but ##||\mathbf{v}||## is also the magnitude of the total velocity with respect to the shore.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K