Simplification - complicated summation involving delta functions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on simplifying the summation involving delta functions, specifically the expression \(\frac{1}{\sqrt{(2^3)}}\sum[δ(k+1)+δ(k-1)]|k>\) for \(k=0\) to \(7\). Participants clarify that the delta functions in question are likely Kronecker deltas rather than Dirac deltas, given the context of summation. The initial attempt at simplification yielded an incorrect result, indicating a misunderstanding of the delta function's role in the expression. Accurate problem formulation and notation are emphasized as critical for effective problem-solving.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of delta functions, specifically Kronecker and Dirac deltas
  • Familiarity with quantum state notation, particularly \(|k>\)
  • Basic knowledge of summation techniques in mathematical physics
  • Ability to interpret and manipulate mathematical expressions involving summation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and applications of Kronecker delta functions
  • Study the differences between Kronecker and Dirac delta functions
  • Learn about quantum state notation and its implications in physics
  • Explore techniques for simplifying complex mathematical expressions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics and mathematics, particularly those dealing with quantum mechanics and mathematical analysis involving delta functions.

Halaaku
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Simplification -- complicated summation involving delta functions

Homework Statement



\frac{1}{\sqrt{(2^3)}}\sum[δ(k+1)+δ(k-1)]|k> for k=0 to 7

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I am trying to simplify the above expression. I get \frac{1}{∏*\sqrt{(2^3)}} |1>, which is incorrect because |1> should have occurred with a constant 1.
Is it right to say that the first delta function can be ignored because my K is not defined for -1?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this really the correct problem statement ? Or just some step in a sequence of steps where you stumble at this point ?

Any idea what the |k> stand for ?

What definition of (or prescription for) ##\delta## do you have available under 2. ?
 
Halaaku, when you post in the homework forum, you need to state the problem more accurately than this, and then show us your thoughts on how to solve it.

If it's a sum rather than an integral, I have to assume that the deltas are Kronecker deltas rather than Dirac deltas. But if you use the notation ##\delta(k-1)## rather than ##\delta_{k,1}##, I have to assume that these are Dirac deltas. The problem doesn't make much sense as it appears in your post.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K