MHB Simplification of Expressions with Exponents

AI Thread Summary
To simplify expressions with exponents without a calculator, understanding the Laws of Exponents is essential. Participants in the discussion emphasize the importance of applying these laws to evaluate expressions accurately. The conversation encourages sharing methods and techniques used for simplification. Users are prompted to discuss their attempts and strategies for solving the problems presented. Mastery of these concepts allows for effective evaluation of exponential expressions.
thorpelizts
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Evaluate each of the following without using the calculator.

View attachment 468

View attachment 469

how to evaluate without even using calculator?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2012-11-14 at 10.17.59 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2012-11-14 at 10.17.59 AM.png
    1 KB · Views: 103
  • Screen Shot 2012-11-14 at 10.18.51 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2012-11-14 at 10.18.51 AM.png
    480 bytes · Views: 96
Mathematics news on Phys.org
thorpelizts said:
Evaluate each of the following without using the calculator.

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/468

View attachment 469

how to evaluate without even using calculator?

Hi thorpelizts, :)

All you need to know to simplify these expressions are the Laws of Exponents. What have you tried so far?
 

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »

Thread 'Non-orthogonal bases'

Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
View full post »
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'

Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'

I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
View full post »

Similar threads

MHB Calculating Exponents for Business Model
Replies
5
Views
2K
I with multiplying rational exponents
Replies
5
Views
1K
MHB Simplifying an expression with exponents
Replies
1
Views
1K
B Understanding Negative Exponents and Bases in Algebraic Expressions
Replies
7
Views
2K
B Why does SQRT((-3)^2) equal 3 instead of -3?
Replies
11
Views
3K
I Method for finding a complex series?
Replies
10
Views
2K
I Equivalence of two complex expressions
Replies
3
Views
1K
Doing Fractional Exponents on Basic Scientific Calculator
Replies
3
Views
8K
MHB Finding Domain for Natural Log with Exponent f(x)=ln(x^2−5x)
Replies
6
Views
2K
How to remember when to add and when to multiply exponents?
Replies
7
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top