MHB Simplification of Trigonometric Expression

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on simplifying the expression \( \cos[k_n(L-\varepsilon)] - \cos k_nL \) for small epsilon. Participants clarify that the initial claim of simplification to \( 2\sin k_nL \) is incorrect, and the correct approximation is \( \sim k_n \varepsilon \sin(k_n L) \). The cosine of a sum formula and Taylor expansion are suggested as methods for simplification. One participant notes that using the cosine sum leads to \( \sin k_nL \sin k_n\varepsilon \), which aligns with the approximation for small angles. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurate trigonometric identities in simplification.
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
$$
\cos[k_n(L-\varepsilon)]-\cos k_nL
$$
I just read this for small epsilon this result can be further simpli ed by using the trigonometric identity for $\cos[k_n(L-\varepsilon)]$. Doing so result is
$$
2\sin k_nL
$$
I don't see this? Can someone explain?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
dwsmith said:
$$
\cos[k_n(L-\varepsilon)]-\cos k_nL
$$
I just read this for small epsilon this result can be further simplied by using the trigonometric identity for $\cos[k_n(L-\varepsilon)]$. Doing so result is
$$
2\sin k_nL
$$
I don't see this? Can someone explain?

It's not true, it is \(\sim k_n \varepsilon\, \sin(k_n L)\)

CB
 
CaptainBlack said:
It's not true, it is \(\sim k_n \varepsilon\, \sin(k_n L)\)

CB

What trig identity did you use though?
 
dwsmith said:
What trig identity did you use though?

You can use the cosine of a sum formula, but you get the same result by taking a Taylor expansion of the first term.

CB
 
Last edited:
CaptainBlack said:
You can use the cosine of a sum formula, but you get the same result by taking a Mclaurin expansion of the first term.

CB

If we use cosine sum, shouldn't it be
$$
\cos k_nL\underbrace{\cos k_n\varepsilon}_{\approx 1 \text{ for small }\varepsilon} + \sin k_nL\sin k_n\varepsilon - \cos k_nL = \sin k_nL\sin k_n\varepsilon
$$
 
Recall $\displaystyle \sin\theta\approx\theta$ for small $\displaystyle \theta$.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K