MHB Simplification of Trigonometric Expression

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on simplifying the expression \( \cos[k_n(L-\varepsilon)] - \cos k_nL \) for small epsilon. Participants clarify that the initial claim of simplification to \( 2\sin k_nL \) is incorrect, and the correct approximation is \( \sim k_n \varepsilon \sin(k_n L) \). The cosine of a sum formula and Taylor expansion are suggested as methods for simplification. One participant notes that using the cosine sum leads to \( \sin k_nL \sin k_n\varepsilon \), which aligns with the approximation for small angles. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurate trigonometric identities in simplification.
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
$$
\cos[k_n(L-\varepsilon)]-\cos k_nL
$$
I just read this for small epsilon this result can be further simpli ed by using the trigonometric identity for $\cos[k_n(L-\varepsilon)]$. Doing so result is
$$
2\sin k_nL
$$
I don't see this? Can someone explain?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
dwsmith said:
$$
\cos[k_n(L-\varepsilon)]-\cos k_nL
$$
I just read this for small epsilon this result can be further simplied by using the trigonometric identity for $\cos[k_n(L-\varepsilon)]$. Doing so result is
$$
2\sin k_nL
$$
I don't see this? Can someone explain?

It's not true, it is \(\sim k_n \varepsilon\, \sin(k_n L)\)

CB
 
CaptainBlack said:
It's not true, it is \(\sim k_n \varepsilon\, \sin(k_n L)\)

CB

What trig identity did you use though?
 
dwsmith said:
What trig identity did you use though?

You can use the cosine of a sum formula, but you get the same result by taking a Taylor expansion of the first term.

CB
 
Last edited:
CaptainBlack said:
You can use the cosine of a sum formula, but you get the same result by taking a Mclaurin expansion of the first term.

CB

If we use cosine sum, shouldn't it be
$$
\cos k_nL\underbrace{\cos k_n\varepsilon}_{\approx 1 \text{ for small }\varepsilon} + \sin k_nL\sin k_n\varepsilon - \cos k_nL = \sin k_nL\sin k_n\varepsilon
$$
 
Recall $\displaystyle \sin\theta\approx\theta$ for small $\displaystyle \theta$.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top