Simplified modeling of teledeltos paper

  • Thread starter Thread starter tempneff
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Modeling Paper
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on modeling the electrical field lines across teledeltos paper in a physics simulation. Key considerations include the assumptions of perfect conductors as equipotential boundaries and the choice between simulating a finite rectangular sheet versus an infinite virtual sheet. Recommended resources for numerical procedures include "Electromagnetics" by Kraus and Carver and "Analysis and Computation of Electric and Magnetic Field Problems" by Binns and Lawrenson. The simulation aims to provide a low-fidelity experience for university undergraduates, emphasizing the relationship between voltage and electric fields.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric field theory and voltage relationships
  • Familiarity with numerical simulation techniques on a Cartesian grid
  • Knowledge of teledeltos paper properties and applications
  • Basic principles of resistive materials and charge distribution
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Electromagnetics" by Kraus and Carver for numerical procedures
  • Explore "Analysis and Computation of Electric and Magnetic Field Problems" by Binns and Lawrenson
  • Study "Electric Field Analysis" by Sivaji Chakravorti for advanced concepts
  • Investigate the properties and applications of teledeltos paper in electrical simulations
USEFUL FOR

Physics educators, simulation developers, and students interested in electrical field modeling and teledeltos paper applications.

tempneff
Messages
82
Reaction score
3
TL;DR
Trying to understand the assumptions behind the use of teledeltos paper to map electric fields
I'm writing a physics simulation to mimic the old equipotential mapping experiment like this one. I can't find much information on how the voltage across this semi-conducting sheet relates to the E-field. Before I start heading down the path sheet resistance and the resistivity of thin-film carbon, I thought I'd ask here.

What are the assumptions that I can make to represent the electrical field lines as voltages across teledeltos paper given a known source voltage and physical dimensions?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I believe the material is best described as resistive, not semiconductive.
You can assume that perfect conductors are equipotential boundary conditions.

You must decide if you are simulating a finite rectangular sheet, with infinite external resistance, or if you are simulating an infinite virtual sheet.

Will you employ a cartesian grid or a curved orthogonal grid.
Each cell will have a voltage, current magnitude and direction, giving 2D voltage gradient.

Do you have a text that demonstrates the numerical procedure on a cartesian grid ?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: tempneff
Start here; Electromagnetics, by Kraus and Carver. See section 3.22
There is a copy here; https://www.qsl.net/va3iul/Files/Old_Radio_Frequency_Books.htm

For mapping electric fields, this book is well worth finding;
Analysis and Computation of Electric and Magnetic Field Problems. Second Edition. 1973.
By K. J. Binns and P. J. Lawrenson. Publisher; Pergamon Press.
ISBN 0-08-016638-5

Also;
Title; Electric Field Analysis. 2015.
By; Sivaji Chakravorti. Publisher; CRC Press.
ISBN-13: 978-1-4822-3337-7 (eBook - PDF)

ebooks or files.pdf can be found.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: tempneff
Thanks @Baluncore, that is the oldest pdf I've seen in some time! I think my initial approach was complicating an easy problem. The lab assumes that the paper is lossless and that the charge distribution matches the electric field created by the electrodes. For the Point-source case (circular electrodes; simulated map voltages, real map voltages, and a simple kq/r calculation all agree. Why? That I'm not sure of.
 
I should have mentioned, that this is a low fidelity simulation for university undergraduates to play with online.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
262
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
1K