I Simplifying a nested radical that includes a complex number

cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
TL;DR Summary
Simplifying nested radical that has a complex number under it.
Dear Everyone,

This post is not a homework assignment...
I want to use the quartic formula. In one step is to solve the resolvent cubic. I know that there is 3 real solutions this particular resolvent cubic. I want to know how Bombelli got his answers before the discovery of the trigonometric method for the casus irrecidulus.
I have this radical ##\sqrt[3]{\frac{24128}{27}-\frac{2520i\sqrt{3}}{27}}##. I know that if the radicand is a perfect cube, then I can cancel the cube root with the cube. So ##(a-bi\sqrt{3})^3= \frac{24128}{27}-\frac{2520i\sqrt{3}}{27}##. We can equate the Real part of both ##(a-bi\sqrt{3})^3## and the ##\frac{24128}{27}-\frac{2520i\sqrt{3}}{27}## and the imagery part of both ##(a-bi\sqrt{3})^3## and the ##\frac{24128}{27}-\frac{2520i\sqrt{3}}{27}##. To yield this system of polynomial equations: $$
\begin{align*}
a^3-9ab^2 &= \frac{24128}{27} \\
3b^3-3a^2b &= \frac{2520}{27} \\
\end{align*}$$

We know that ##a,b\not=0##.I am having a hard time solving this system by hand. Is there any tips on solving a system of polynomials?

Thanks,
Cbarker1
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you introduce c=b/a your first equation will contain a3 and a3 c2 while the second equation contains a3 c3 and a3 c. Divide both equations by each other and you get an expression that only depends on c. Unfortunately it's a cubic equation again, and I don't know if its solutions are nice.
 
  • Like
Likes cbarker1 and jedishrfu
mfb said:
If you introduce c=b/a your first equation will contain a3 and a3 c2 while the second equation contains a3 c3 and a3 c. Divide both equations by each other and you get an expression that only depends on c. Unfortunately it's a cubic equation again, and I don't know if its solutions are nice.
I looked the solution on wolframalpha where I will type the solution form as ##(a,b)##. ##(-\frac{16}{3},\frac{14}{3})##, ##(\frac{29}{3},\frac{1}{3})##, and ##(\frac{-13}{3},-5)##. It has nice solutions...
 
Factoring it actually looks nice, you get ##a(a-3b)(a+3b)## and (after dividing by 3) ##b(b-a)(b+a)##.

I don't really know where to go from there.
 
note: I did this by hand, and I have a sign difference with the wolframalpha solution, but I think the observation is correct
I factored out 2/3 at the beginning giving
##3016c^3+945c^2-3016c-105 = 0##
If you look at the factors of 3016 (f) and -105 (g), you can by guesswork find a solution of the form
##(f_1c-g_1)(f_2c-g_2)(f_3c-g_3)##
which works because there are rational solutions of 7/8, -1/29 and -15/13
 
Last edited:
In general, taking cube roots of complex numbers looks like this:

##(a + bi)^3 = c + di##

With the benefit of hindsight, we can redefine:

##R = \sqrt{a^2 + b^2}##
##x = a/R##

##S = \sqrt{c^2 + d^2}##
##y = c/S##

So the problem becomes to find ##R## and ##x## in terms of ##S## and ##y##.

The first part is easy: ##R = S^{1/4}##

Then the equation for ##x## becomes

##(x +i \sqrt{1-x^2})^3 = y +i\sqrt{1-y^2}##

Cubing the left sude and taking just the real part gives:

##x^3 - 3x(1-x^2)= y##
or
##4x^3 -3x = y##

So this reduces the problem to solving a real cubic equation. Not sure that’s an improvement...
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top