Simplifying a nested radical that includes a complex number

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around simplifying a nested radical involving complex numbers, specifically focusing on solving a system of polynomial equations derived from a cubic equation. Participants explore methods to approach the problem, including historical references to Bombelli's work and the quartic formula.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Mathematical reasoning, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a radical expression and sets up a system of polynomial equations based on equating real and imaginary parts.
  • Another participant suggests introducing a substitution to simplify the equations, leading to a new cubic equation dependent on a single variable.
  • A later reply mentions finding solutions using WolframAlpha, providing specific pairs of values for the variables.
  • Another participant discusses factoring the equations and expresses uncertainty about the next steps in the solution process.
  • One participant notes a discrepancy in signs between their manual calculations and the solutions found online, while still affirming the correctness of their observations.
  • A further contribution outlines a general method for taking cube roots of complex numbers, leading to a real cubic equation but questions whether this is an improvement.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to solve the system of equations, and multiple methods and perspectives are presented without resolution.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions and dependencies on the definitions of complex numbers and polynomial equations, with unresolved mathematical steps in the proposed solutions.

cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
TL;DR
Simplifying nested radical that has a complex number under it.
Dear Everyone,

This post is not a homework assignment...
I want to use the quartic formula. In one step is to solve the resolvent cubic. I know that there is 3 real solutions this particular resolvent cubic. I want to know how Bombelli got his answers before the discovery of the trigonometric method for the casus irrecidulus.
I have this radical ##\sqrt[3]{\frac{24128}{27}-\frac{2520i\sqrt{3}}{27}}##. I know that if the radicand is a perfect cube, then I can cancel the cube root with the cube. So ##(a-bi\sqrt{3})^3= \frac{24128}{27}-\frac{2520i\sqrt{3}}{27}##. We can equate the Real part of both ##(a-bi\sqrt{3})^3## and the ##\frac{24128}{27}-\frac{2520i\sqrt{3}}{27}## and the imagery part of both ##(a-bi\sqrt{3})^3## and the ##\frac{24128}{27}-\frac{2520i\sqrt{3}}{27}##. To yield this system of polynomial equations: $$
\begin{align*}
a^3-9ab^2 &= \frac{24128}{27} \\
3b^3-3a^2b &= \frac{2520}{27} \\
\end{align*}$$

We know that ##a,b\not=0##.I am having a hard time solving this system by hand. Is there any tips on solving a system of polynomials?

Thanks,
Cbarker1
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you introduce c=b/a your first equation will contain a3 and a3 c2 while the second equation contains a3 c3 and a3 c. Divide both equations by each other and you get an expression that only depends on c. Unfortunately it's a cubic equation again, and I don't know if its solutions are nice.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cbarker1 and jedishrfu
mfb said:
If you introduce c=b/a your first equation will contain a3 and a3 c2 while the second equation contains a3 c3 and a3 c. Divide both equations by each other and you get an expression that only depends on c. Unfortunately it's a cubic equation again, and I don't know if its solutions are nice.
I looked the solution on wolframalpha where I will type the solution form as ##(a,b)##. ##(-\frac{16}{3},\frac{14}{3})##, ##(\frac{29}{3},\frac{1}{3})##, and ##(\frac{-13}{3},-5)##. It has nice solutions...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb
Factoring it actually looks nice, you get ##a(a-3b)(a+3b)## and (after dividing by 3) ##b(b-a)(b+a)##.

I don't really know where to go from there.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cbarker1
note: I did this by hand, and I have a sign difference with the wolframalpha solution, but I think the observation is correct
I factored out 2/3 at the beginning giving
##3016c^3+945c^2-3016c-105 = 0##
If you look at the factors of 3016 (f) and -105 (g), you can by guesswork find a solution of the form
##(f_1c-g_1)(f_2c-g_2)(f_3c-g_3)##
which works because there are rational solutions of 7/8, -1/29 and -15/13
 
Last edited:
In general, taking cube roots of complex numbers looks like this:

##(a + bi)^3 = c + di##

With the benefit of hindsight, we can redefine:

##R = \sqrt{a^2 + b^2}##
##x = a/R##

##S = \sqrt{c^2 + d^2}##
##y = c/S##

So the problem becomes to find ##R## and ##x## in terms of ##S## and ##y##.

The first part is easy: ##R = S^{1/4}##

Then the equation for ##x## becomes

##(x +i \sqrt{1-x^2})^3 = y +i\sqrt{1-y^2}##

Cubing the left sude and taking just the real part gives:

##x^3 - 3x(1-x^2)= y##
or
##4x^3 -3x = y##

So this reduces the problem to solving a real cubic equation. Not sure that’s an improvement...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K