Simplifying a transfer function to find overshoot

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the percentage overshoot (%OS) of a system based on its transfer function, T(s). Participants explore methods for analyzing the transfer function, including the use of second-order assumptions and the Laplace Transform, while addressing the complexities of the given equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using second-order assumptions to find the damping ratio (zeta) for calculating %OS but expresses concern about the complexity of the transfer function.
  • Another participant proposes using the Laplace Method to determine the time response Vout(t) from Vout(s) to analyze overshoot, but does not provide specific shortcuts.
  • A different participant explains that determining Vo(s) involves using T(s) and the Laplace Transform of a unit step input, and suggests consulting a table for sinusoidal and exponential components.
  • One participant mentions that the question is from a past exam, implying it should be solvable quickly.
  • Another participant discusses canceling terms in the transfer function and emphasizes the importance of poles closest to the imaginary axis in influencing system dynamics.
  • One participant corrects themselves, noting that the focus should be on poles rather than zeros when determining system dynamics.
  • A participant shares their findings of the roots of the quadratics and discusses the impact of pole proximity on overshoot, noting discrepancies in results when using MATLAB.
  • One participant questions the validity of second-order assumptions in this context, suggesting uncertainty about their applicability.
  • Another participant expresses confusion about the meaning of %OS and suggests using partial fraction expansion and plotting to analyze the system's behavior.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various methods and approaches to analyze the transfer function, but there is no consensus on the best method or the validity of second-order assumptions. Disagreement exists regarding the interpretation of the transfer function and the implications for overshoot.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of the transfer function and the need for careful consideration of poles and zeros. There are unresolved mathematical steps and differing interpretations of the system's behavior based on the transfer function.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and practitioners in control systems, particularly those interested in analyzing transfer functions and understanding overshoot in system responses.

soyks
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have question where I am asked to find the % overshoot of a system based only on its transfer function.

T(s) = 15(s+2.1)
(s+2)(s2+4s+29)(s2+2s+50)

I'm assuming I need to use second order assumptions and then find the damping ratio (zeta) to find the %OS, but this equation looks a little complicated for that.

I noticed that the numerator (s+2.1) could be canceled with the (s+2) term in the denominator because they're similar. Am I allowed to do that?

Then I'm still left with two quadratic equations on the bottom.. I still can't see how you could approximate the %OS.
 

Attachments

  • Picture 1.png
    Picture 1.png
    3.1 KB · Views: 1,070
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi soyks! http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/5725/red5e5etimes5e5e45e5e25.gif

The only approach I can think of is to use your knowledge of the Laplace Method to determine the time response Vout(t) from Vout(s), and then carefully analyze that equation for Vout(t) to determine its overshoot.

I can't see any shortcuts; maybe someone else can.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for your reply NascentOxygen. I'm not too sure what you mean though, could you possibly begin explaining the method you'd use, then I'll see if I can get it from there.

In the mean time, anyone else have any ideas?
 
You determine Vo(s) using T(s) and the Laplace Transform of a unit step input. Then consult a table that mathematicians have provided (or otherwise) to deduce the sinusoidal and exponential components (or whatever) that make up that particular Vo(t). You could plot Vo(t), but calculus allows you to calculate when dV/dt =0, and the first occurrence will probably be of the overshoot.

If you have studied the Laplace Method, examples of this will be in any textbook, illustrating how to determine the step response of a system.
 
I should probably mention this is a question from a past exam. So I assume it should be solvable within a few minutes
 
Based on your knowledge of control systems there are some really quick things you can determine!


T(s) = \frac{15\left(s+2.1\right)}{\left(s+2\right)\left(s^2+4s+29\right)\left(s^2+2s+50\right)}

Firstly

T(s) = \frac{\left(s+2.1 \right)}{\left(s+2\right)}
are really close so they can be canceled right away.

And are left with
T(s) = \frac{15}{ \left(s^2+4s+29 \right) \left(s^2+2s+50 \right)}

Secondly, one basic rule is: the zeros closest to the imaginary line have the strongest influence on the dynamics of the system. Thus, you want to find the closest roots and throw away the others. That step is easy enough to do it yourself right :)
 
viscousflow said:
Secondly, one basic rule is: the zeros closest to the imaginary line have the strongest influence on the dynamics of the system. Thus, you want to find the closest roots and throw away the others. That step is easy enough to do it yourself right :)

Err this should be poles, or roots of the denominator.
 
Yeah I figured that was the case :P

Ok thanks heaps for that reply! You really explained it well.

I just found the roots of the quadratics... the first one is -2±5j and the second is -1±7j. As you said, the closer one to the imaginary axis has the larger effect, but I was taught that it had to be at least 5 times smaller than the other poles to dominate.. I'd say this is pushing it. I checked with MATLAB, finding the overshoot of the system with both sets of quadratics and then the first one only, and the overshoot dropped from 78% to 28% - not too accurate.

Maybe they don't expect any better? Since this is an exam question.. I can't see of any way of doing it better but if you do, let me know.
 
Sorry I just re-read the question - it says 'comment on the validity of second order assumptions'. I suppose this would be one where its pretty uh.. ****. :P
 
  • #10
soyks,

I don't know what % overshoot means. That transfer function is an exponentially decaying sine wave which has a high point of 0.05, and is mostly dead after 6 secs. You can get its inverse LaPlace by a partial fraction expansion, after which you can look up each term in a table. Then do a quick plot and all will be revealed.

Ratch
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
6K