MHB Simplifying Boolean Circuits: W NAND X & YNORZ

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on simplifying a Boolean expression derived from a circuit using De Morgan's theorem. The original expression is identified as f = (w NAND x) NOR (y NOR z). It is rewritten in Boolean form as f = ¬(¬(wx) + ¬(y + z)). Applying De Morgan's theorem leads to the transformation of the expression into f = wx(y + z). The conversation suggests that further simplification to Sum of Products (SoP) form may be possible, indicating a need for clarity in notation and understanding of Boolean algebra principles.
shamieh
Messages
538
Reaction score
0
Find the simplified equation (SOP FORM) corresponding to the following circuit (i.e. apply Demorgan's theorem to bring the negations inside the parenthesis).

View attachment 1466So is it saying W NAND X which means (w!x!) + YNORZ so (w!x!) + (y!z!) = wxyz?
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    8.9 KB · Views: 88
Technology news on Phys.org
shamieh said:
Find the simplified equation (SOP FORM) corresponding to the following circuit (i.e. apply Demorgan's theorem to bring the negations inside the parenthesis).

View attachment 1466So is it saying W NAND X which means (w!x!) + YNORZ so (w!x!) + (y!z!) = wxyz?

Your notation is a bit confusing to me. So let me write it as I'm used to.

You have f = (w NAND x) NOR (y NOR z).

Written in boolean form this is:
$$f = \overline{\overline{wx} + \overline{y+z}}$$
Applying De Morgan's Theorem ($\overline{p+q} = \overline p \cdot \overline q$) yields:
$$f = \overline{\overline{wx}} \cdot \overline{\overline{y+z}} = wx(y+z)$$

Perhaps you can simplify it further to SoP form?
 
Thread 'Is this public key encryption?'
I've tried to intuit public key encryption but never quite managed. But this seems to wrap it up in a bow. This seems to be a very elegant way of transmitting a message publicly that only the sender and receiver can decipher. Is this how PKE works? No, it cant be. In the above case, the requester knows the target's "secret" key - because they have his ID, and therefore knows his birthdate.
I tried a web search "the loss of programming ", and found an article saying that all aspects of writing, developing, and testing software programs will one day all be handled through artificial intelligence. One must wonder then, who is responsible. WHO is responsible for any problems, bugs, deficiencies, or whatever malfunctions which the programs make their users endure? Things may work wrong however the "wrong" happens. AI needs to fix the problems for the users. Any way to...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top