Simplifying Feynman Diagram for Nasty 10 Point Green's Function?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter vertices
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem Wick's theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on simplifying the Feynman diagram for a complex 10-point Green's function, represented as \int d^4y_1 d^4y_2 <0|T[\phi (x_1) \phi (x_2) \phi^4 (y_1) \phi^4 (y_2)]|0>. The simplification is achieved by applying Wick's theorem, which allows the expression to be condensed into a single Feynman diagram featuring two external points, one vertex, and one loop. This approach significantly reduces the complexity of the original expression, making it easier to analyze and work with.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Feynman diagrams
  • Familiarity with Green's functions in quantum field theory
  • Knowledge of Wick's theorem
  • Basic concepts of quantum field operators
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Wick's theorem in detail to understand its applications in quantum field theory
  • Explore the construction of Feynman diagrams for multi-point Green's functions
  • Learn about the implications of external points and vertices in Feynman diagrams
  • Investigate advanced techniques for simplifying complex quantum field expressions
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, theoretical physicists, and students of quantum field theory seeking to simplify complex expressions and enhance their understanding of Feynman diagrams and Green's functions.

vertices
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Why is the Feynman diagram for the following nasty 10 point Green's function so simple: I mean it only has two external points, one vertex, and one loop:

Here is the offending function:

\int d^4y_1 d^4y_2 &lt;0|T[\phi (x_1) \phi (x_2) \phi^4 (y_1) \phi^4 (y_2)]|0&gt;

which I am assuming is simply equal to:

\int d^4y_1 d^4y_2 &lt;0|T[\phi (x_1) \phi (x_2) \phi (y_1) \phi (y_1)\phi (y_1) \phi (y_1) \phi (y_2)\phi (y_2) \phi (y_2) \phi (y_2)]|0&gt;?

I mean this expression is very complicated - let's see:

F(\phi (x_1) \phi (x_2))F(\phi (y_1) \phi (y_1) ) F(\phi (y_1) \phi (y_1) ) F(\phi (y_2) \phi (y_2))F(\phi (y_2) \phi (y_2)) +<br /> F(\phi (x_1) \phi (y_1))F( \phi (x_2) \phi (y_1))F(\phi (y_1) \phi (y_1) ) F(\phi (y_2) \phi (y_2))F(\phi (y_2) \phi (y_2)) +...

(where F( ) is a contraction of operators).

Is there any way to simply this horrendous expression?

Thanks...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, there is a way to simplify this expression. First, note that the Feynman diagram for this nasty 10-point Green's function will only have two external points, one vertex, and one loop. This means that all of the terms in the expression can be grouped together into a single diagram by using Wick's theorem. This theorem states that any product of fields can be expressed as a sum of contractions of pairs of operators. Therefore, each term in the expression can be represented as a single Feynman diagram with two external points, one vertex, and one loop. The final result is that the nasty 10-point Green's function can be represented as a single Feynman diagram with two external points, one vertex, and one loop. This is much simpler than the original expression and is much easier to work with.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K