MHB Simplifying the Summation Identity Using Complex Numbers

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving a summation identity involving complex numbers and roots of unity. The original problem requires demonstrating that the sum of a specific fraction equals a given expression. The approach involves using binomial expansion, but the author finds it unhelpful and expresses frustration over the complexity of the problem. A more successful method is proposed, utilizing the properties of complex numbers and partial-fraction decomposition to derive the desired identity. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the effectiveness of complex analysis in simplifying summation identities.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Hi,

I have been trying to solve this difficult problem for some time and I thought of at least two ways to prove it but to no avail...the second method that I thought of was to employ binomial expansion on the denominator and that did lead me to the result where it only has x terms in my final proof, but it did not lead to the desired result (and I should be able to tell beforehand that I wouldn't get anywhere near to the desired form of the result by expanding the expression on the denominator too)...I am really at my wit's end and really very mad:mad: at myself now and I'd be grateful if someone could throw some light on to the problem...thanks in advance.:)Let $$-1<x<1$$, show that $$\sum_{k=0}^{6} {\frac{1-x^2}{1-2x\cos (\frac{2\pi k}{7})+x^2}}=\frac{7\left(1+x^7 \right)}{1-x^7}$$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Let $$-1<x<1$$, show that $$\sum_{k=0}^{6} {\frac{1-x^2}{1-2x\cos (\frac{2\pi k}{7})+x^2}}=\frac{7\left(1+x^7 \right)}{1-x^7}$$.
This problem cries out for the use of complex numbers. I'll prove a slightly more general result.Let $\omega = e^{2\pi i/n}$, with complex conjugate $\overline{\omega} = \omega^{-1}$. The $n$th roots of unity are $\omega^k\ (0\leqslant k\leqslant n-1)$, and $\displaystyle 1-x^n = \prod_{k=0}^{n-1}(1-\omega^k x)$. It follows that there must be a partial-fraction decomposition of the form $$\frac n{1-x^n} = \sum_{k=0}^{n-1}\,\frac{s_k}{1-\omega^k x}.$$ To find the coefficients $s_j$, multiply both sides by $1-\omega^jx$ to get $$\frac {n(1-\omega^jx)}{1-x^n} = s_j + (1-\omega^jx)f(x)$$ for some function $f(x)$ that is continuous at $\omega^{-j}.$ Then $$s_j = \lim_{x\to\omega^{-j}}(s_j + (1-\omega^jx)f(x)) = \lim_{x\to\omega^{-j}}\frac {n(1-\omega^jx)}{1-x^n} = \lim_{x\to\omega^{-j}}\frac {-n\omega^j}{-nx^{n-1}} = 1,$$ (using l'Hôpital's rule to evaluate the limit). Therefore $$\frac n{1-x^n} = \sum_{k=0}^{n-1}\,\frac1{1-\omega^k x}.$$ Multiply that by 2, and use the facts that $\overline{\omega}^k = \omega^{n-k}$ and $\omega^k + \overline{\omega}^k = 2\cos\bigl(\frac{2k\pi}n\bigr)$, to get $$\frac {2n}{1-x^n} = \sum_{k=0}^{n-1}\,\biggl(\frac1{1-\omega^k x} + \frac1{1-\overline{\omega}^k x}\biggr) = \sum_{k=0}^{n-1}\,\frac{2-2x\cos\bigl(\frac{2k\pi}n\bigr)}{1-2x\cos\bigl(\frac{2k\pi}n\bigr) + x^2}.$$ Finally, subtract $n$ from both sides to get $$\frac{n(1+x^n)}{1-x^n} = \frac {2n}{1-x^n} - n = \sum_{k=0}^{n-1}\,\biggl(\frac{2-2x\cos\bigl(\frac{2k\pi}n\bigr)}{1-2x\cos\bigl(\frac{2k\pi}n\bigr) + x^2} - 1\biggr) = \sum_{k=0}^{n-1}\,\frac{1-x^2}{1-2x\cos\bigl(\frac{2k\pi}n\bigr) + x^2}.$$
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
4K