SIN contest: ballistic missile

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem related to the physics of a ballistic missile's trajectory, specifically focusing on the calculations involving relative velocity and latitude changes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the reasoning behind the different denominators in two expressions related to the missile's velocity calculations. Questions arise about the validity of assuming linear relationships in relative velocity and the implications of traveling between latitudes.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes attempts to clarify the reasoning behind the expressions used in the problem. Some participants express confusion about the implications of the missile's trajectory and relative velocity, while others provide insights that lead to further questioning.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the assumptions of the problem, particularly regarding the relationship between velocity and time as the missile transitions between latitudes. There is also a mention of a specific time frame (10 minutes) that may influence the calculations.

fchen720
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The problem and solution involving the ballistic missile question is in the attached picture.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Why does the first expression have (24)(6) in the denominator, when the second expression has (24)(6)(2) ?

My thought process:
If the missile could teleport to latitude 45 right after being launched from latitude 30, and have the velocity of latitude 30, then I can see why the first expression (without the 2) is valid.

But instead, the missile needs to gradually work its way to having that large of a relative velocity as it moves north. So it goes from 0 relative velocity to the full relative velocity and so dividing by 2 will get the average relative velocity.

Then i had doubts that the relationship between relative velocity and time was linear. I worked out some math and it seemed like a trigonometric relationship with velocity being proportional to cosine(arclength).

Am i confusing myself?
I would appreciate it if someone could clarify this for me.
 

Attachments

  • IMG.jpg
    IMG.jpg
    37.2 KB · Views: 470
Physics news on Phys.org
fchen720 said:
[
Why does the first expression have (24)(6) in the denominator, when the second expression has (24)(6)(2) ?

Am i confusing myself?

Yes you are :)
What do cos 30 and cos 45 equal?
 
:redface: Thanks for pointing that out, but I'm still confused. Since the missile must travel to latitude 45 doesn't it spend time not gaining as much ground as it potentially could compared to if it were on latitude 45 during the entire 10 minutes (but at the higher speed)?
 
Ok nevermind I understand now.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K