Single slit diffraction, from an angle

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the angle of the first null in a single slit diffraction pattern when a plane wave of 400-nm light is incident at an angle on a 25-µm slit. The established formula for minima in single slit diffraction, \(\sin \theta = m \frac{\lambda}{d}\), is applicable, where \(m\) represents the order of the minimum. The user expresses concern about the effective width of the slit due to the angle of incidence, but the solution remains straightforward by applying the formula directly, treating the problem as if the light were traveling in the opposite direction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of single slit diffraction principles
  • Familiarity with the equation for minima in diffraction patterns
  • Knowledge of wave properties of light, specifically wavelength
  • Basic trigonometry for angle calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of angle of incidence on diffraction patterns
  • Study advanced diffraction phenomena, such as double slit interference
  • Learn about the impact of slit width on diffraction patterns
  • Explore practical applications of diffraction in optical systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying optics and wave phenomena, as well as educators looking for examples of diffraction problems.

mooshasta
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
I've encountered a standard problem about single slit diffraction, but there's a slight change to the problem and I don't know how it should be dealt with.

The question is:

A plane wave of 400-nm light is incident on a 25-µm slit in a screen, as shown in the figure below. At what incident angle will the first null of the diffraction pattern be on a line perpendicular to the screen?

http://www.tubaroo.com/ssd.PNG
I know the equation for the minima in a single slit diffraction problem is \sin \theta = m \frac{\lambda}{d} where m is 1,2,3,... and d is the width of the slit. I want to say that the question is not as tricky as I'm making it out to be, and that I should just solve for \theta using that equation. But if this were the case, it seems to me that since the light is coming from an angle, the effective width of the slit should be smaller, or something along those lines. I've scoured the internet for this type of situation, but every time I see the single slit diffraction problem, the angle of incidence of the light is 0 degrees.

Can anyone help me out?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Just reverse the problem. Treat the porblem as if the light was traveling in the opposite direction and apply your formulae as you would normally.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K