Singular 3x3 Matrix: Solving & Understanding

  • Thread starter Thread starter Seneka
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    3x3 Matrix
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 2K views
Seneka
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
The problem and the statement are attached. I found the solution as shown in the attached files but I don't understand why in the solutions they added R1 and R3 to get a row equivalent to R1. Problem is Q4.
Relevant Equations
-
243408
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20190511_201252.jpg
    IMG_20190511_201252.jpg
    72.9 KB · Views: 301
  • IMG_20190511_201246.jpg
    IMG_20190511_201246.jpg
    102.1 KB · Views: 314
Physics news on Phys.org
In the solution, they are taking the determinant to see if the matrix is singular. One of the three row operations you can do on determinants is replacing a row by the sum of itself and another row. The other two row operations are switching two rows, and replacing a row by a multiple of itself.
The reason they replaced R1 by R1 + R3 was to get a zero entry in the first row, which makes finding the determinant easier.
 
Mark44 said:
In the solution, they are taking the determinant to see if the matrix is singular. One of the three row operations you can do on determinants is replacing a row by the sum of itself and another row. The other two row operations are switching two rows, and replacing a row by a multiple of itself.
The reason they replaced R1 by R1 + R3 was to get a zero entry in the first row, which makes finding the determinant easier.

But won't that change the value of R1 which will be equal to 3 instead of 2.
 
Seneka said:
But won't that change the value of R1 which will be equal to 3 instead of 2.

Yes. The two equations combined to give an equation which now says 0 = 3, with a right hand side of 3.

The right-hand side doesn't matter in deciding if the determinant is 0, but it does matter if determining whether the system has zero or infinitely many solutions. 0 = 3 is a contradiction, so this system is inconsistent, no solutions. If you got 0 = 0 would be true for all x, y, z.
 
Thanks @RPinPA @Mark44

I was more confused as to why row switching worked. A nice explanation I found was by looking at what the determinant does. By looking at a simple two by two the determinant will give you an area of a parallelogram. When you add a row to another one that creates a parallelogram with the same area and therefore doesn't change the value of the determinant.