Siobhan Morgan's cosmology calculator has a new url

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter marcus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculator Cosmology
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Siobhan Morgan's cosmology calculator is now accessible at this link. Unlike Ned Wright's modified calculator, which requires inputting "light travel time" to derive redshift z, Morgan's tool allows users to directly input parameters such as omega (0.27), lambda (0.73), and Hubble constant (71). Wright offers multiple versions of his calculator, including an "ADVANCED" version that incorporates sophisticated parameters like the equation of state for dark energy. The discussion highlights the importance of these tools for understanding cosmological concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cosmological parameters such as omega and lambda.
  • Familiarity with redshift and light travel time concepts.
  • Knowledge of Hubble's Law and its implications in cosmology.
  • Basic proficiency in using web-based calculators for scientific computations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the functionalities of Ned Wright's cosmology calculator, including its various versions.
  • Investigate the implications of the equation of state for dark energy in cosmological models.
  • Research alternative cosmology calculators developed by other users, such as Hellfire's version.
  • Study the significance of light travel time in observational cosmology.
USEFUL FOR

Astrophysicists, cosmologists, and students interested in the practical application of cosmological calculations and parameters.

marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,752
Reaction score
795
her new url is
http://faculty.cns.uni.edu/~morgan/ajjar/Cosmology/cosmos.html

her cosmology calculator is a handy resource especially since Ned Wright modified his cosmology calculator earlier this year----July sometime.

Now, with Wright's, you can't input a redshift z.
You have to input a "light travel time" and then it tells you the z.

this is not intuitive to me because what one OBSERVES is a redshift z and then one wants to know things like how far away and what light travel time was etc.
============

with Siobhan you have to type in parameters
0.27 for "omega" (abbr. omega sub matter, the matter component)
0.73 for "lambda" (cosmological constant component)
71 for H

Ned Wright gives you these values of the parameters as a default.

If anyone has a link for some other alternative cosmology calculator, please post. I think Hellfire programmed his own but i don't have a link.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Space news on Phys.org
marcus said:
If anyone has a link for some other alternative cosmology calculator, please post. I think Hellfire programmed his own but i don't have a link.
You can find it here. Some parts are still work in progress.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the link, marcus. I actually use this thing on occasion [too much time on my hands]. Also, thanks to hellfire for the link to his calculator. That one is better suited to my usually evil purposes [humor checking papers that make odd claims].
 
Hi Hellfire and Chronos,

thanks for the link, and Chronos thank YOU for the kind word in that other thread and for your "write-in" vote.

I made a minor mistake in the original post about Ned Wright's calculator. He has several versions now.

There is still the familiar old one that you enter z and it gives you travel time etc.

And there is the new version that I happened to see and took for the only one available, where you enter the travel time and it gives you z and other stuff.

And finally there is an "ADVANCED" version where you put in sophisticated parameters like (not merely the cosmological constant) but the EQUATION OF STATE of the alleged dark energy or quintessence, and other things. It could turn out to be a lot of fun to play around with.
 
marcus, that is dangerous candy to be passing out. No telling what I might do with that kind of ammunition. You do an excellent job giving us heads ups and explaining the significance of papers in 'beyond the standard model', which I think is extremely important and fascinating. I think that topic deserves a category of its own. That is what draws serious scientists to PF. i Have seen more world class scientists chime in here than any other forum on PF. And that is largely due to your efforts to draw high level discussion to these subjects. I mostly watch in awe. I have limited understanding of such issues, but have learned more than I ever imagined possible here. In short, I greatly appreciate your contributions.
 
Chronos said:
dangerous candy...
:bugeye:
:biggrin:

it's a twoway street

BTW didn't selfAdjoint say he would be away for the holidays?
feels like a skeleton crew at the moment

==============
PS
I see the 2006 Guru placards are up now!
Congratulations to hellfire on the handsome badge of honor.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
31K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
12K
  • · Replies 548 ·
19
Replies
548
Views
220K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
11K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K