Can Point Charges Be Used to Approximate Charged Bodies?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sahilmm15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    bodies Charged
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Point charges can effectively approximate charged bodies when the sizes of these bodies are significantly smaller than the distances separating them. This approximation simplifies calculations, particularly in electric field analysis, as the differences between the fields of various shapes, such as cubes and tetrahedrons, become negligible at considerable distances. The "size of the body" refers to the largest dimension across the object, which must be small relative to the observation distance for the approximation to hold true.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and their properties
  • Familiarity with the concept of point charges in electrostatics
  • Basic knowledge of geometric shapes and their electric field characteristics
  • Proficiency in calculus for integral calculations related to electric fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical derivation of electric fields from point charges
  • Explore the differences in electric fields produced by various geometric shapes
  • Learn about the conditions under which approximations in physics are valid
  • Study the implications of the inverse square law in electrostatics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electrostatics, electrical engineers, and anyone involved in theoretical physics or applied mathematics.

sahilmm15
Messages
100
Reaction score
27
"If the sizes of charged bodies are very small as compared to the distances between them, we treat them as point charges". Can you explain me the statement. And what does "sizes of charged bodies" refer here. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The electric field of a charged cube, for example, is different from a charged tetrahedron. Very far from the object, though, the differences are negligible, and the difference from the field of a point charge is negligible. So we can just treat it as a point charge and save ourselves from some nasty integrals.

The size of the body, in this context, isn't really precisely defined, since we're talking about an approximation. It's something like the largest distance there is across the object. You need to be much further away than that.
 
Ibix said:
The electric field of a charged cube, for example, is different from a charged tetrahedron. Very far from the object, though, the differences are negligible, and the difference from the field of a point charge is negligible. So we can just treat it as a point charge and save ourselves from some nasty integrals.

The size of the body, in this context, isn't really precisely defined, since we're talking about an approximation. It's something like the largest distance there is across the object. You need to be much further away than that.
Thanks for the reply. I appreciate it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibix

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K