What do we mean by the charge on a body is denoted by "q"?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter SHASHWAT PRATAP SING
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Body Charge Mean
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the meaning of the notation "q" used to denote electric charge on a body. Participants explore the implications of this notation, the significance of charge values such as +2, and the conceptual understanding of electric charge as a property of subatomic particles. The scope includes theoretical and conceptual clarifications regarding electric charge and its representation in equations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question what is meant by the charge on a body being denoted by "q" and whether it refers to a property or a measurement.
  • Others propose that "q" is simply a variable representing the quantity of charge, similar to how "x" is used in mathematics, and that it has units in Coulombs.
  • It is suggested that a charge of +2 could be interpreted as +2 times the elementary charge |e|, which is approximately 1.6 x 10-19C.
  • Some participants emphasize the importance of context, stating that "charge +2" is meaningless without units, while "+2C" is well-defined.
  • There are discussions about the concept of excess charge in macroscopic bodies, which contain nearly equal amounts of positive and negative charges, leading to an excess of one type.
  • Participants express uncertainty about the distinction between "amount" and "numeric value" of charge, with some asserting that charge can be both positive and negative.
  • Several participants seek confirmation of their understanding of the phrase "the charge on a body," suggesting it refers to the numeric value of charge measured and denoted by "q."
  • There is a mention that the notation "q" can represent a variable charge, not necessarily requiring measurement.
  • Some participants note that the statement "the charge on a body is denoted by 'q'" should be self-explanatory in a physics context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various interpretations of the notation "q" and the concept of charge, leading to multiple competing views. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the precise implications of these terms and their usage.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the need for context when discussing charge values, as the meaning can change based on whether units are specified. There is also a recognition that the concept of charge includes both positive and negative values, which adds complexity to the discussion.

SHASHWAT PRATAP SING
Messages
119
Reaction score
13
I am sorry if this is a silly question,
we know that-
Electric Charge is a characteristic property of a Subatomic particle.
And, a body is electrically charged by the transfer of electrons.

Then, what does it mean by this the charge on a body is denoted by q.What are we talking here.
Are we deoting this property by q ?
Also, what does it mean when we say a body has charge +2 ? what this +2 has to do with the property electric charge ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is expression of charge quantity as you use x in equation of math. It has unit Coulomb in SI Unit.
Charge has minimum unit called |e|, e is for electron. I guess +2 means charge +2|e|.
 
SHASHWAT PRATAP SING said:
Also, what does it mean when we say a body has charge +2 ?
If it doesn't come with units or context defining the units, "charge +2" is meaningless. +2C is well defined.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale
anuttarasammyak said:
It is expression of charge quantity as you use x in equation of math. It has unit Coulomb in SI Unit.
anuttarasammyak please tell me am I correct ?
This means that suppose a body has the property of electric charge and we measure it and it was found out to be +2C. So, we denote this +2C by q. Thus, this equation q=+2C is the mathematical representation of the above statement.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anuttarasammyak
Electric charge is a slightly odd case. There is apparently a fundamental unit of charge denoted by |e|, the electronic charge of ##1.6x10^{-19}C##. If someone says "the charge is +3" they mean +3|e|. This is analogous to saying "the speed is 0.5" which means 0.5c. Just shorthand notation everyone agrees to use when convenient.
 
What does this line mean "the charge on a body".
Does this mean suppose a body has the property of Electric Charge and here we are talking about the magnitude of this charge.
 
It really means the excess charge a body. Macroscopic bodies are filled with +/- charges of nearly equal magnitude. The preponderance of one will lead to an excess.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
hutchphd said:
It really means the excess charge a body. Macroscopic bodies are filled with +/- charges of nearly equal magnitude. The preponderance of one will lead to an excess.
hutchphd please tell me am I right ?
So, Basically this line-->"the charge on a body" means the amount of charge on a body or the numeric value of charge on a body. Right ?
Suppose a body has the property of Electric Charge and we intend to measure this property.So, by saying this line-->"the charge on a body" we mean that we are talking about the amount of charge on a body or the numeric value of charge on a body.
And after measuring this propety ,We denote this amount of charge(numeric value) by q. Which would be of the form q = ± ne.
 
Last edited:
SHASHWAT PRATAP SING said:
hutchphd please tell me am I right ?
So, Basically this line-->"the charge on a body" means the amount of charge on a body or the magnitude of charge on a body. Right ?
Suppose a body has the property of Electric Charge and we intend to measure this property.So, by saying this line-->"the charge on a body" we mean that we are talking about the amount of charge on a body or the magnitude of charge on a body.
We denote this amount of charge(magnitude) by q .
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_charge
 
  • #10
hutchphd said:
It really means the excess charge a body. Macroscopic bodies are filled with +/- charges of nearly equal magnitude. The preponderance of one will lead to an excess.
SHASHWAT PRATAP SING said:
hutchphd please tell me am I right ?
So, Basically this line-->"the charge on a body" means the amount of charge on a body or the magnitude of charge on a body. Right ?
You are ignoring the key emphasis (bold) in the response you got. And what do you mean by magnitude? Charge can be negative.
 
  • #11
A.T. said:
You are ignoring the key emphasis (bold) in the response you got. And what do you mean by magnitude? Charge can be negative.
A.T. I know that charge can be negative.By saying magnitude I am taking about the numeric value of charge or amount of the charge.
I am just saying that in this line-->"the charge on a body" means the amount of charge on a body or the numeric value of charge.
Please help me
 
  • #12
PeroK said:
PeroK, please tell me am I right here ?
So, Basically this line-->"the charge on a body" means the amount of charge on a body or the numeric value of charge on a body. Right ?
Suppose a body has the property of Electric Charge and we intend to measure this property.So, by saying this line-->"the charge on a body" we mean that we are talking about the amount of charge on a body or the numeric value of charge on a body.
And after measuring this propety ,We denote this amount of charge(numeric value) by q.
 
  • #13
SHASHWAT PRATAP SING said:
PeroK, please tell me am I right here ?
So, Basically this line-->"the charge on a body" means the amount of charge on a body or the numeric value of charge on a body. Right ?
Suppose a body has the property of Electric Charge and we intend to measure this property.So, by saying this line-->"the charge on a body" we mean that we are talking about the amount of charge on a body or the numeric value of charge on a body.
And after measuring this propety ,We denote this amount of charge(numeric value) by q.
I don't know that there is a difference between "amount" and "numeric value" in this case. If ##q## is the charge, then ##q## can be positive or negative. Those being the two types of charge found in nature.

This is one way electromagnetism is different from gravity: there is only positive mass; whereas, there are positive and negative charges.
 
  • #14
PeroK said:
I don't know that there is a difference between "amount" and "numeric value" in this case. If ##q## is the charge, then ##q## can be positive or negative. Those being the two types of charge found in nature.

This is one way electromagnetism is different from gravity: there is only positive mass; whereas, there are positive and negative charges.
PeroK I think you didn't understand my question.

My question is What does this line mean "the charge on a body" ?

for which I am asking that have I understood the concept ?
So, Basically this line-->"the charge on a body" means the amount of charge on a body or the numeric value of charge on a body. Right ?
Suppose a body has the property of Electric Charge and we intend to measure this property.So, by saying this line-->"the charge on a body" we mean that we are talking about the amount of charge on a body or the numeric value of charge on a body.
And after measuring this propety ,We denote this amount of charge(numeric value) by q.
which would be of the form q = ± ne.

I know that charge can be positive and negative. For that I have also edited my question.
 
  • #15
SHASHWAT PRATAP SING said:
PeroK I think you didn't understand my question.

My question is What does this line mean "the charge on a body" ?

for which I am asking that have I understood the concept ?
So, Basically this line-->"the charge on a body" means the amount of charge on a body or the numeric value of charge on a body. Right ?
Suppose a body has the property of Electric Charge and we intend to measure this property.So, by saying this line-->"the charge on a body" we mean that we are talking about the amount of charge on a body or the numeric value of charge on a body.
And after measuring this propety ,We denote this amount of charge(numeric value) by q.

I know that charge can be positive and negative. For that I have also edited my question.
Yes, but most people would be happy with "Let ##q## be the charge on a body." You don't have to measure it because ##q## can be a variable. The same as any other variable, like mass and velocity and length.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SHASHWAT PRATAP SING
  • #16
PeroK, then what does this line mean -->the charge on a body is denoted by "q"?
 
  • #17
SHASHWAT PRATAP SING said:
PeroK, then what does this line mean -->the charge on a body is denoted by "q"?
I believe you're expected to understand a statement like that without a more fundamental analysis - certainly a physics textbook author would expect that statement to be self-explanatory.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vela and Vanadium 50
  • #18
"The charge on a body"...

In principle, this is a number, a signed integer equal to the number of positive charged particles in the body minus the number of negatively charged particles in the body.

In practice, for bodies larger than tiny atomized drops of oil the charge will be a large number. Large enough that we can divide by about 6 x 1018 to get a much more usable number -- the number of Coulombs of charge the body has.

So a body with an excess of 6 x 1018 positive elementary charges will have a charge of approximately one Coulomb.

When we say that this is "denoted by 'q'" we just mean that we are going to use the variable name "q" to denote the charge on the object. So for the above object, q would be 1 Coulomb.

There is nothing physically meaningful about the choice of the letter q. It is just a handy conventional choice. As long as everyone uses "q" to denote an amount of charge, it is easy to read equations and not get confused worrying that "q" might instead be used to denote time, distance, mass or temperature.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SHASHWAT PRATAP SING
  • #19
jbriggs444 Please tell me am I correct here -
Suppose a body has the property of Electric Charge and we intend to measure this property.So, by saying this line-->"the charge on a body" we mean that we are talking about the amount of charge on a body or the numeric value of charge on a body.
And after measuring this propety ,We denote this amount of charge(numeric value) by q. Which would be of the form q = ± ne.
So, when we say this line--> "charge on the object" means thatwe are talking about the amount of charge on a body. It is this Which we denote by q.
That's why we say this line that -->The charge on a body denoted by 'q' .
 
  • #20
SHASHWAT PRATAP SING said:
jbriggs444 Please tell me am I correct here -
Suppose a body has the property of Electric Charge and we intend to measure this property.So, by saying this line-->"the charge on a body" we mean that we are talking about the amount of charge on a body or the numeric value of charge on a body.

"The charge on a body".
"The body's charge".
"The numeric value of charge on a body".

All are synonymous. They mean the same thing. [Though one might quibble that the last one needs units to make it truly synonymous].

Like mass, height, volume, density, length, temperature, location or velocity, charge is a value that quantifies some aspect of an object. It is a property of the object.

And after measuring this propety ,We denote this amount of charge(numeric value) by q. Which would be of the form q = ± ne.
I do not know what you mean to say here. The variable q will have a numeric value. That value may be positive, negative or zero. We would probably choose to express that value as a number and a unit of measure.

For instance "q = 1 elementary charge"
or "q = -0.3 Coulomb".

That's why we say this line that -->The charge on a body denoted by 'q' .
We say that because it establishes an abbreviation. We can then use the letter q because it is clumsy to fill in equations with "the charge on the body" when we could put in "q" instead.

$$\text{The Force of the first body on the second body} = \text{Coulomb's Constant}\frac{\text{The charge of the first body} \times \text{The charge of the second body}} {\text{The distance between the two bodies}^2}$$
 
Last edited:
  • #21
jbriggs444 my question is this only I want to know that what does this line -->The charge on a body denoted by q mean ?
and as you said-
"The charge on a body".
"The numeric value of charge on a body".
"The body's charge".
All are synonymous. They mean the same thing.

Ok, so this line--> The charge on a body denoted by q means here we are talking about the amount of charge on a body.
So, q denotes the amount of charge on a body which is of the form --> q= ± ne
and we can choose to express that value as a number and a unit of measure.

Suppose If we are given this equation q=+2C , so this means that a body has the property of electric charge and the amount of electric charge this body has is +2C, Which is represented by q.
so, we write q= +2C
Am I correct now ?
 
  • #22
SHASHWAT PRATAP SING said:
So, q denotes the amount of charge on a body which is of the form --> q= ± ne
I do not agree with this. One would never write "q= ± ne"

The ± symbol means that there are two possibilities. Either q = +ne or q = -ne. But if "ne" is the number of excess elementary charges on the object then there is only one possibility: q=ne [elementary charge units].

ne might be positive or it might be negative. But there is no need to indicate this with a leading ±. Doing so is erroneous.
SHASHWAT PRATAP SING said:
Suppose If we are given this equation q=+2C , so this means that a body has the property of electric charge and the amount of electric charge this body has is +2C, Which is represented by q.
so, we write q= +2C
Am I correct now ?
Yes, I think I agree with this. But we started with "q=+2C" and we ended with "q=+2C". That's a tautology.
 
  • #23
jbriggs444 by q= ± ne
I mean that if a body is positively charged we will write q=ne
and if the body is negatively charged we will write q=-ne

But , yes you are right we will write q=ne and proper signs will be used while taking the values as ne might be positive or it might be negative. There is no need to indicate this with a leading ±
 
  • #24
SHASHWAT PRATAP SING said:
jbriggs444 by q= ± ne
I mean that if a body is positively charged we will write q=ne
and if the body is negatively charged we will write q=-ne
As it seems you realize now,

If the body is positively charged then ne is positive and q=ne.
If the body is negatively charged then ne is negative and q=ne.
If the body has zero charge then ne is zero and q=ne.
 
  • #25
So jbriggs444, tell me have I now understood the concept correctly ?

Ok, so this line--> "The charge on a body is denoted by q" means here we are talking about the amount of charge on a body.
So, q denotes the amount of charge on a body which is of the form --> q= ne

and we can choose to express that value as a number and a unit of measure.

Suppose If we are given this equation q=+2C , so this means that a body has the property of electric charge and the amount of electric charge this body has is +2C, Which is represented by q.
so, we write q= +2C
 
  • #26
SHASHWAT PRATAP SING said:
So jbriggs444, tell me have I now understood the concept correctly ?

Ok, so this line--> "The charge on a body is denoted by q" means here we are talking about the amount of charge on a body.
So, q denotes the amount of charge on a body which is of the form --> q= ne

and we can choose to express that value as a number and a unit of measure.

Suppose If we are given this equation q=+2C , so this means that a body has the property of electric charge and the amount of electric charge this body has is +2C, Which is represented by q.
so, we write q= +2C
What is "ne" supposed to mean? You keep using the term without definition.

Also, if we are given that q=+2C then we do not need any physical reasoning whatsoever to conclude that q=+2C.
 
  • #27
SHASHWAT PRATAP SING said:
here, n means the number of electrons transferred and e is the elementary charge. So, q = ne tells us about the quantisation of charge.
Number transferred? That has little to do with the number that are there now. "q" conventionally denotes the net charge that is there now.

If n is the excess number of electrons currently on an object and e is the unit of one [positive] elementary charge then then the correct formulation would be q=-ne
 
  • #28
SHASHWAT PRATAP SING said:
here, n means the number of electrons transferred and e is the elementary charge. So, q = ne tells us about the quantisation of charge.
Sorry, jbriggs444 I have written wrong. So, I have deleted that post.
q=ne this means that the charge on a body(q) is integral multiple of a basic unit of charge (e).

jbriggs444 said:
Also, if we are given that q=+2C then we do not need any physical reasoning whatsoever to conclude that q=+2C

jbriggs444 here I am just telling that what does q= +2C mean.
 
  • #29
SHASHWAT PRATAP SING said:
Sorry, jbriggs444 I have written wrong. So, I have deleted that post.
q=ne this means that the charge on a body(q) is integral multiple of a basic unit of charge (e).
Here "q" is the charge on the body, "n" is the net excess of positive elementary charges on the body and "e" is a unit of charge equal to one elementary charge (i.e. the charge of one proton).

Yes.

So, for instance, a pith ball with deficit of 6 x 1017 electrons would have charge q equal to +6 x 1017 e or approximately +0.1 Coulombs.

[I suspect that is a rather enormous charge for a pith ball]
 
  • #30
So jbriggs444, tell me have I now understood the concept correctly ?

Ok, so this line--> "The charge on a body is denoted by q" means here we are talking about the amount of charge on a body.
So, q denotes the amount of charge on a body which is of the form --> q= ne

and we can choose to express that value as a number and a unit of measure.

Suppose If we are given this equation q=+2C , so this means that a body has the property of electric charge and the amount of electric charge this body has is +2C, Which is represented by q.
so, we write q= +2C
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
894
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K