What Is the Maximum Coefficient of Static Friction for a Sliding Block System?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a system of two blocks connected by a rope over a frictionless pulley, where the goal is to determine the maximum coefficient of static friction required for one block to begin sliding. The context includes the masses of the blocks and the forces acting on them.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between static friction and the forces acting on the blocks, including tension and weight. There is an exploration of the conditions under which the blocks are in equilibrium and the implications for acceleration.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively questioning the assumptions made about acceleration and the balance of forces. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need to consider static equilibrium, and there is a recognition of the need to correctly identify the forces acting on the blocks.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of a diagram that may provide additional context, but access to it is restricted. The discussion also highlights the importance of understanding static friction in the context of the problem setup.

yuvlevental
Messages
44
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 5.50 kg block (m1) is connected by means of a massless rope to a 3.15 kg block (m2). The pulley is frictionless. Calculate the maximum value for the coefficient of static friction, if the 5.50 kg block is to begin sliding.

The diagram is attatched to the post.

Homework Equations


Friction coefficient = (Frictional Force)/(Normal Force)
Acceleration = (m2*9.8)/(m1 + m2)
Of course, Force = mass*acceleration

The Attempt at a Solution


Acceleration = (m2*9.8)/(m1 + m2)
Acceleration = 3.5688 m/s^2
3.5688*5.5 = 19.6284 N = frictional force
Normal force = 5.5*9.8 = 53.9 N

19.6284/53.9 = .36416

I know that the answer isn't right, what am I doing wrong?
 

Attachments

  • tablepulley.gif
    tablepulley.gif
    776 bytes · Views: 546
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Attach the diagram as an image. (That site requires authorization to view.)
 
Ok, I did.
 
Note that the block is just about to barely begin sliding. So what can you take as the acceleration? (Hint: Note that you are finding the coefficient of static friction.)
 
I already gave the acceleration, 3.5688 m/s^2, and doesn't the force of static friction balance the force of tension, which is 3.5688*5.5?
 
yuvlevental said:
I already gave the acceleration, 3.5688 m/s^2,
I know. My point was that this acceleration is wrong. :wink: How did you arrive at this value?
and doesn't the force of static friction balance the force of tension,
Exactly! So what's the acceleration if the forces are balanced?
 
The weight of the hanging mass exerts a net force on both masses. (Assuming that the surface is frictionless)

(3.15*9.8)/(3.15+5.5) = 3.5688 m/s^2

Also, the acceleration needs to be zero, so then i did 5.5*3.5688 to find the frictional force.
 
Last edited:
yuvlevental said:
The weight of the hanging mass exerts a net force on both masses. (Assuming that the surface is frictionless)

(3.15*9.8)/(3.15+5.5) = 3.5688 m/s^2
You found the acceleration of the masses assuming no friction. But you know there's friction, so this is not relevant.

Also, the acceleration needs to be zero
Doesn't this contradict what you just did above?

The acceleration is zero. So what's the net force on m1?
 
there is none because force is equal to mass * acceleration. so then what am i doing wrong?
 
  • #10
The net force is zero. So add up the forces on m1 and set equal to zero. What horizontal forces act on m1?

(This is a static equalibrium problem.)
 
  • #11
Ok, I got it right...

I figured that the tension in the rope would be equal to the weight of m2 in equilibrium.
Then, I set it to equal the force of friction.
I divided the force of friction by the mass of m1 to get .573.

Thanks for the help!
 
  • #12
Good! You're welcome.
 

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K