MHB Slope Intercept Equation with parallel

  • Thread starter Thread starter mhester88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parallel Slope
mhester88
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm not understanding this question at all and am not sure how to even begin answering this. Any help would be appreciated.

Write the slope-intercept equation of the line that is parallel to -9x-7y=4 and has the same y-intercept as the graph of -5x+11y=-22.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
start by converting both of the given equations to slope-intercept form (y = mx + b, correct?)

parallel lines have the same slope
 
mhester88 said:
I'm not understanding this question at all and am not sure how to even begin answering this. Any help would be appreciated.

Write the slope-intercept equation of the line that is parallel to -9x-7y=4 and has the same y-intercept as the graph of -5x+11y=-22.
Since this was posted 6 months ago:
-9x- 7y= 4 is the same as 7y= -9x- 4 or y= (-9/7)x- 4/7. That has slope -9/7. Any line parallel to it has the same slope so can be written y= (-9/7)x+ c for some number c.

The y-intercept of a graph is the point (0, y) where the graph crosses the y-axis. Setting x= 0 in -5x+ 11y= -22, 11y= -22 so y= -2. The y-intercept is (0, -2). Setting x= 0 in y= (-9/7)x+ c, y= c and we want that to be -2.

y= (-9/7)x- 2. If, like me, you don't like fractions, multiply both sides by 7:
7y= -9x- 14.

You could also add 9x to both sides to get the slightly "prettier"
9x+ 7y= -14.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top