Slowing moving water in a fast moving streambed

  • Thread starter Thread starter BernieM
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Water
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around methods to slow moving water in a stream channel without interfering with the particle flow along the bottom or modifying the stream bed shape. Participants explore various ideas and approaches to achieve a significant reduction in water velocity over a specified distance, considering practical applications related to gold recovery systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using a float tied to the shore with chains or a turbulence-inducing device to slow the water flow by about 50% over 10 meters.
  • Another proposes a sponge-like structure to slow down the water in the entire channel, while also mentioning that limiting the channel height could reduce total water flow.
  • A participant emphasizes the need to keep the bottom half of the channel free of obstruction while slowing the overall water velocity, suggesting that turbulence at the surface could create drag affecting the water below.
  • Questions are raised about the purpose of reducing velocity, with one participant noting that some methods may inadvertently increase velocity at the bottom.
  • One participant describes a specific scenario involving a gold recovery device that requires a lower water flow to function effectively, indicating that the current velocity is too high and causes scouring instead of gold collection.
  • Another participant suggests that a ceiling could lower flow velocity, while another proposes enclosing the channel to create a pipe-like structure.
  • Concerns are expressed about the implications of having a fixed amount of water entering the channel and the need for an escape mechanism to avoid increasing turbulence.
  • One participant mentions the importance of the channel's slope in gravity-fed systems and provides a link to formulas related to gravity flow.
  • Another suggests changing the temperature of the water or the boundary to increase local viscosity as a potential method to slow the flow.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a variety of ideas and methods, with no clear consensus on the best approach to slow the water flow without interfering with sediment transport. Multiple competing views remain regarding the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed solutions.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to the channel's dimensions, the need for sediment flow, and the implications of altering water velocity. The discussion includes unresolved assumptions about the water input and the effects of various proposed methods on flow dynamics.

BernieM
Messages
280
Reaction score
6
Is there any simple method of slowing moving water in a stream channel that does not interfere with particle flow along the bottom of the stream bed and does not require the stream bed shape to be modified in any way?

An example that I have been considering is a float tied off to the shore with a lot of chains or some other kind of turbulence inducing device dangling into the stream.

I need to brake the water flow around 50% over a distance of about 10 meters if it can be done.

The channel is only a meter across and 1/3 meter deep, with a constant drop of around 8 cm per meter.

Paddle wheels on top the water??

Any brilliant simple ideas?
 
Last edited:
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
I guess you want to slow down the water in the whole channel?
Some sponge-like structure?
If you want to slow down the water flow at the bottom, you have to influence the water flow there - you can just try to make it as uniform as possible. If you do not want to slow it down significantly, just limit the height of the channel, this will reduce the total water flow.
 
What I need to do is keep the bottom half of the channel free of obstruction so that sediments and things continue to flow freely along the bottom without backing up significantly on some obstacle, yet remove velocity from the entire channel (well of course this will cause SOME sedimentation as the water slows but this is acceptable). So for example if the water flow is 10 meters per second in the channel I want to slow it to 5 meters per second. I figured that slowing water at the surface and turbulence created there would also create drag as that turbulence affected the water below it too. I could imagine a bunch of curved foil shapes at the surface deflecting the laminar water flow at the surface downward, interfering with the laminar flow below.
 
Last edited:
Why do you want to reduce the velocity?
Do you want to reduce the total water flow? -> height limit looks good
Do you need a certain velocity at some point? -> why, where?

Some methods to reduce the total water flow will also increase the velocity at the bottom of the channel.
 
I need to decrease the velocity at the bottom yet not interfere with the bottom.

The basic problem is this:

I have a device that is excellent at gold recovery but uses less water flow than other types.
It needs to be used at the output stage of a standard sluice installed on a dredge boat with limited space, and so the 'channel' length is not very long. (runs out of deck)

The water velocity going over my sluice is too high and scouring the pockets out rather than collecting gold due to the size of the dredge in use and other equipment requirements upstream from it.

So I need to cut the velocity at the bottom of the 'channel' to probably 1/2 it's current velocity before it crosses my sluices.

I can bleed water off the top of the channel if needed as my sluice requires very little water to operate anyhow, and I can interrupt the water at the top of the channel, but can not interrupt the material flow on the bottom, although I can slow it which is what is desired.
 
Last edited:
A ceiling will certainly lower the flow velocity.
 
Do you mean to force it into a pipe for a distance? Essentially making a pipe out of it I mean, enclosed on all sides and top.
 
Something like that, yes.
 
10 m /sec isn't slow for a stream...

V = flow/area

how big is this thing?

What if you just put walls on your channel to make it twice as deep?
 
  • #10
Change the temperature of the water or the boundary to increase the local viscosity.
 
  • #11
The thing that bothers me is that you have a channel of a certain size that has a certain amount of water entering it, and you want to have roughly half that water pass through it or exit it. roughly 2 units go in, and you want 1 unit to go out.

If you cannot regulate the input, then the extra water has to go someplace.

Simply impeding the flow without creating an escape mechanism for the water will merely increase the turbulence or something.

if this is a gravity fed system, then the flow also depends on the angle of descent. At which point you will have to adjust this to get the appropriate flow rate.

see this page for a quick collection of formulas:

http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/mannings-formula-gravity-flow-d_800.html

The slope is a major variable in gravity fed systems
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
16K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
21K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K