Small Angle Question in relation to Astronomy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the small angle formula in astronomy, specifically regarding a binary star system located 400 light-years away with a separation of 36 arcseconds (0.01 degrees). The initial confusion arises from the incorrect application of the formula due to the angle being measured in degrees rather than radians. The correct conversion of 0.01 degrees to radians results in a value of 0.00017, which aligns with the expected physical separation of 4 light-years. The small angle formula, which states that θ ≈ sin(θ) ≈ tan(θ), is valid only when θ is expressed in radians.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the small angle formula in trigonometry
  • Knowledge of angular measurements in both degrees and radians
  • Familiarity with basic astronomical concepts, such as light-years and binary star systems
  • Ability to perform unit conversions between degrees and radians
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical derivation of the small angle approximation
  • Learn about angular measurement conversions between degrees and radians
  • Explore the implications of small angle approximations in astronomical observations
  • Study the properties of binary star systems and their significance in astronomy
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy students, astrophysicists, and anyone interested in understanding the mathematical principles behind astronomical measurements and observations.

astropi
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
First of all this is NOT for class! Secondly, this seems rather simple, so perhaps I am simply overlooking the obvious. Anyway, here goes:

If some binary star is about 400 ly away, and a telescope gives a separation of 36" (0.01 degrees) for the binary, then can we use the small angle formula? Well, it certainly seems like we should be able to. However, the small angle formula for tangent is is just [ tex ]tan\theta \sim \theta[ /tex ]. If we then calculate the physical separation between the two stars we get 4 ly, which is incorrect. If instead of taking the small angle formula we just take the tangent of 0.01 we get 0.00017 and that in turn leads to the "correct" distance. My question becomes why does the small angle formula fail here? What am I missing? Thanks!

edit: sorry, I can not get the latex to work for some reason!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The small angle formula, i.e. theta ~= sin(theta) ~= tan(theta), only works when theta is measured in radians, not when theta is measured in degrees. If you convert 0.01 degrees into radians, theta(radians) = 0.01 * pi/180 = .00017. Then everything works.
 
phyzguy said:
The small angle formula, i.e. theta ~= sin(theta) ~= tan(theta), only works when theta is measured in radians, not when theta is measured in degrees. If you convert 0.01 degrees into radians, theta(radians) = 0.01 * pi/180 = .00017. Then everything works.

Yes, you're absolutely right. And, believe it or not, I realized that as soon as I posted (duh)!
Thanks for the reply though :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K