Smallest possible uncertainty in the positon of an electron

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
10 replies · 8K views
bina0001
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that the smallest possible uncertainty in the position of an electron whose speed is given by [tex]\beta=v/c[/tex] is
[tex]\Delta x_{min}=\frac{h}{4\pi m_{0}c}(1-\beta^{2})^{1/2}[/tex]


Homework Equations


[tex]\Delta x \Delta p=\frac{h}{4\pi}[/tex]

[tex]p=mv= \frac{m_{0}}{\sqrt{1-\beta^{2}}}v[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


so from the momentum equation, i multiply in c:

[tex]p=\frac{m_{0}c}{\sqrt{1-\beta^{2}}}\frac{v}{c}<br /> =\frac{m_{0}c}{\sqrt{1-\beta^{2}}}\beta[/tex]

then i diffrenciate with respect to [tex]\beta[/tex] to get this:

[tex]\frac{dp}{d\beta}=\frac{m_{0}c}{\sqrt{1-\beta^{2}}}(1+\frac{\beta^{2}}{1-\beta^{2}})[/tex]

So:

[tex]\Delta p=\frac{m_{0}c}{\sqrt{1-\beta^{2}}}(1+\frac{\beta^{2}}{1-\beta^{2}})\Delta\beta[/tex]

So then i assumed that for minimum [tex]\Delta x[/tex] we need maximum [tex]\Delta p[/tex] and thus maximum [tex]\Delta \beta[/tex], which will give us [tex]\Delta \beta=1[/tex] (because max value of v=c)

But then when i sub this into the uncertainty equation i still have the [tex](1+\frac{\beta^{2}}{1-\beta^{2}})[/tex] term i can't get rid off.

And are the assumtions i am making valid?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ah ok thanks tahnks, that's a bit helpful.
But i am still a bit unclear. That mean i don't have to do any rigourous maths like diffrenciations?

and also i am not clear on the part they said, "when [tex]\Delta p[/tex] exceeds [tex]mc[/tex], the uncertainty in energy is greater than [tex]mc^{2}[/tex]" Why?
 
bina0001 said:
i am not clear on the part they said, "when [tex]\Delta p[/tex] exceeds [tex]mc[/tex], the uncertainty in energy is greater than [tex]mc^{2}[/tex]" Why?

In SR, the relationship between energy and momentum is:

[tex]E=\sqrt{(pc)^2+(m_0c^2)^2}[/tex]

So, [itex]\Delta E \approx \left\vert\frac{\partial E}{\partial p}\right\vert\Delta p=[/itex]____?
 
bina0001 said:
[tex]\Delta p=\frac{m_{0}c}{\sqrt{1-\beta^{2}}}(1+\frac{\beta^{2}}{1-\beta^{2}})\Delta\beta[/tex]

So then i assumed that for minimum [tex]\Delta x[/tex] we need maximum [tex]\Delta p[/tex] and thus maximum [tex]\Delta \beta[/tex], which will give us [tex]\Delta \beta=1[/tex] (because max value of v=c)

But then when i sub this into the uncertainty equation i still have the [tex](1+\frac{\beta^{2}}{1-\beta^{2}})[/tex] term i can't get rid off.

And are the assumtions i am making valid?

You can simplify this further:

[tex]1+\frac{\beta^{2}}{1-\beta^{2}}=\frac{(1-\beta^2)+\beta^{2}}{1-\beta^{2}}=\frac{1}{1-\beta^{2}})[/tex]

So using this method, the maximum [itex]\Delta p[/itex] would be [itex]m_{0}c(1-\beta^{2})^{-3/2}[/itex], but this is greater than [itex]m_{0}c(1-\beta^{2})^{-1/2}[/itex] by a factor of [itex](1-\beta^{2})^{-1}[/itex] and the energy argument provides tighter restrictions on [itex]\Delta p[/itex].
 
hi gabbagabbahey, sidetrack, what is your signature all about?
 
JayKo said:
hi gabbagabbahey, sidetrack, what is your signature all about?

It's just a line from the (hilarious IMO) TV series "Better off Ted".
 
gabbagabbahey said:
It's just a line from the (hilarious IMO) TV series "Better off Ted".

oh i see, quite a new series, wasn't air in my country though. thanks.
 
sorry to be a bit daft, but still cat really get to the end.

Let me summarize wat i understand so far first.

The maximum possible uncertainty in E of a particle can be [tex]m_{0}c^{2}[/tex], because anything beyond that it would have enough energy to form another particle.

and from

[tex]E=\sqrt{(pc)^{2}+(m_{0}c^{2})^{2}}[/tex]

we get

[tex]\frac{\partial E}{\partial p}=\frac{pc^{2}}{\sqrt{(pc)^{2}+(m_{0}c^{2})^{2}}}[/tex]

So the uncertainty relation with be:

[tex]\Delta E=\frac{pc^{2}}{\sqrt{(pc)^{2}+(m_{0}c^{2})^{2}}} \Delta p[/tex]

so set [tex]\Delta E=m_{0}c^2[/tex] and [tex]p=(1-\beta^{2})^{(-1/2)}m_{0}c \beta[/tex]

But i end up getting

[tex]\Delta p= \frac{m_{0}c}{\beta}}[/tex]

am i doing anything wrong along the way?
 
Last edited:
hi bina, I think you are close to the answear in the very first post...
just cancel the term [tex](1+\frac{\beta^{2}}{1-\beta^{2}})[/tex], since b should be regarded as a given value. it is only dv we need to deal with. however, dv is c*db right? :)