Smart or Attractive? Biology's Debate on Selection

  • Thread starter Thread starter Evo
  • Start date Start date

If made to choose, what would be your choice?

  • your mate would be intelligent but homely

    Votes: 63 65.6%

  • your mate would be beautiful but dumb

    Votes: 33 34.4%
  • Total voters
    96
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
Sign up Log in
203 replies · 17K views
Evo
Staff Emeritus
Messages
24,114
Reaction score
3,277
We've been having a discussion over in biology about selection.

Be honest, if you had only two choices, your mate could either be very intelligent, but homely, or beautiful and dumb, which would you choose?
 

Discussion

Biology news on Phys.org
EnumaElish said:
I voted; and feel lucky I didn't have to choose in real life.

Because you couldn't choose homely and dumb?

Or because you couldn't choose smart and beautiful?

Or because, in real life, the answer would be none of the above because the chances are almost nil of finding a mate that will have anything to do with you.

Yes, this poll really needed more options. I really wanted to choose homely, dumb, and drunk.
 
Last edited:
My choice depends on what your definition of "mate" is. If it's not just sex, then I'll definitely vote for the intelligent one. I could never live with an idiot.
 
I dunno.. intelligence and beauty are nice, but love, compassion, and kindness are more important to me than both. I don't really care what mix of intelligence and beauty she has, as long as she has a good heart.

- Warren
 
radou said:
My choice depends on what your definition of "mate" is. If it's not just sex, then I'll definitely vote for the intelligent one. I could never live with an idiot.
It's nothing to think too deeply about. I seem to have remembered discussions where a lot of people placed looks over intelligence and I was curious to see if they had this difficult of a choice, if it would sway them in a particular direction.

I mean eventually we all get old and not that good looking.

The easy choice obviously would to have looks and intelligence.
 
Last edited:
which one says no most often?
 
Astronuc said:
How dumb? and How homely? :biggrin:
Let's say 5 on a scale of ten for both, so average.

I just realized I'm somewhat shallow. :redface: I want at least a 6 on my scale of attractivess with DD being a 10.
 
I voted for intelligent but homely. If my wife finds out that I voted at all, it will be the end of me. After all, she's no dummy. I doubt I could even go 5 rounds with someone stupid. Looks wouldn't help in that case. So put a bag over her head. And put another one over your own head too if it'll help.
 
Astronuc said:
How dumb? and How homely? :biggrin:

Precisely!

I'm not sure I could stand being around either a box of rocks in terms of mentality, or someone so hideous I felt icky if they touched me. But, if it's more like someone who's very intelligent and just mediocre in looks vs someone drop-dead gorgeous and just mediocre in intelligence, I'd choose intelligence over looks. If we're talking about the complete extremes of Einstein vs Rainman, I think I'd have to go with looks (as long as he doesn't try talking while the actual mating was happening, that might be more doable).
 
Evo said:
Let's say 5 on a scale of ten for both, so average.

I just realized I'm somewhat shallow. :redface: I want at least a 6 on my scale of attractivess with DD being a 10.

Okay, if we're talking average for the "lesser" trait, I'm going for intelligent and average looking.
 
Moonbear said:
Precisely!

I'm not sure I could stand being around either a box of rocks in terms of mentality, or someone so hideous I felt icky if they touched me. But, if it's more like someone who's very intelligent and just mediocre in looks vs someone drop-dead gorgeous and just mediocre in intelligence, I'd choose intelligence over looks. If we're talking about the complete extremes of Einstein vs Rainman, I think I'd have to go with looks (as long as he doesn't try talking while the actual mating was happening, that might be more doable).
See post 11, sorry, I should have set parameters.

We will assume that both will be equally nice.
 
Unless she's rich, in which case I would prefer stupid.
 
I don't care about looks. I couldn't live without an active, mutually benefiting exchange of ideas, thoughts, comments etc.
 
From the Riders in the Sky (a wonderful musical group!) Stronger whiskey and weaker women is what I say!

I have dated some unattractive women that were a joy to talk to and hang out with, and some stunners that were brain-dead, and some that were otherwise interesting, but wanted "family" so strongly that it seemed like I was being evaluated as a wage-earner, not a mate. My steady date for a couple of years in HS was a Miss Maine runner-up. She was pretty, leggy, shapely, and musically talented, but it took me a couple of years before I realized that her agenda didn't fit with my more open-ended outlook. I ended up with a mate that had an upbringing more closely fitted to mine, and we have pulled together as a team. Sorry for the horse/oxen analogy, but we work very well together.
 
Last edited:
I'd also take intelligence and average looks over beauty and average intelligence. Beauty fades with time anyway, and I've always found that women with mediocre, "cute" looks grow on me rapidly if I'm attracted to their personalities. After a few weeks of interaction I think they're positively gorgeous.

- Warren
 
Assuming this is only for mating purposes (which is all that is specified in the OP), I chose looks. (noone tell my wife)
 
I also feel I should add this

http://www.scribd.com/doc/34/Attractiveness-Scale
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm sorry to say it, but I'd take beauty and average intelligence. I'm lucky, though, since my girlfriend is both beautiful and intelligent (albeit in completely different areas to me!)
 
NeoDevin said:
Assuming this is only for mating purposes (which is all that is specified in the OP), I chose looks. (noone tell my wife)

I guess it depends on whether it works better for you to have your partner gagged or yourself blindfolded. :rolleyes: I might also be able to put up with a dumb partner if I went profoundly deaf.
 
Evo said:
Let's say 5 on a scale of ten for both, so average.
I'd go with intelligence, and I assume by that there is some comparable level of sincerity, compassion and kindness along the lines of what chroot mentioned.

I just realized I'm somewhat shallow. :redface:
Bull - you are not!

I want at least a 6 on my scale of attractivess with DD being a 10.
I'm going to by you a new set of glasses. :biggrin:
 
If I had to choose I'd probably choose neither.
 
Moonbear said:
I guess it depends on whether it works better for you to have your partner gagged or yourself blindfolded. :rolleyes: I might also be able to put up with a dumb partner if I went profoundly deaf.
They say the ideal marriage is between a blind woman and a deaf man.
 

Similar threads

I really with my course selection for next year

  • Astro826
  • · Replies 4 ·
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
4

Ethical Debate on a 'Smart' Pill: Is It Right?

  • quantum
  • · Replies 20 ·
  • General Discussion
Replies
20