So, a weird question about water and oil separation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the dynamics of phase separation between water and oil, specifically questioning whether the rate of separation accelerates or decelerates over time. Participants highlight that phase separation is influenced by factors such as buoyancy and the presence of surfactants, which stabilize emulsions. The conversation emphasizes that this topic is significant in various industries, including food and consumer products, where controlling phase separation can enhance product stability and shelf life. Additionally, the complexity of phase separation dynamics is acknowledged, indicating that it remains an active area of research.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic chemistry and physics principles
  • Familiarity with phase separation concepts
  • Knowledge of buoyancy effects in fluid dynamics
  • Awareness of surfactants and their role in emulsions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of surfactants on emulsion stability
  • Explore the dynamics of buoyancy-driven phase separation
  • Study practical applications of phase separation in the food industry
  • Investigate mathematical models used to quantify separation rates
USEFUL FOR

Students of chemistry and physics, researchers in fluid dynamics, professionals in the food and consumer products industries, and anyone interested in the practical applications of phase separation.

DOB87
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Well, the question is not weird, but the circumstances are.

I am not a physicist, and I am not studying physics. I am a student at a university, and quite interested in physics, but I am intentionally keeping myself away from taking any more physics classes.

I like to be able to imagine physics without the constraints of the math. I understand that the math has to add up in the end, but so far I have had an issue with it limiting my ability to think through it because I get caught up in numbers before I can see the end result. I've been able to come up with multiple theories so far that match up with currently accepted theories this way, without any previous knowledge that those theories exist.

But, working through what I am currently on, which is a question that no theory has explained thus far, requires that I understand something. It is a simple question from basic chemistry \ physics, but I cannot remember the answer, nor can I find a simple solution online.

When water separates from oil, does the rate of separation accelerate over time, or does it decelerate over time? Or does it accelerate\decelerate with certain concentrations of water vs oil, and finally reach an equilibrium?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is "the rate of separation". I.e. How do you quantify separation?

Btw, physics without math is silly. The "constraints" that math imposes is that it excludes illogical theories.
 
DOB87 said:
<snip>
When water separates from oil, does the rate of separation accelerate over time, or does it decelerate over time? Or does it accelerate\decelerate with certain concentrations of water vs oil, and finally reach an equilibrium?

The question is not so weird- phase separations are an active area of research and have a lot of practical applications (especially in the food and consumer products industries).

Oil and water form a very simple system, the phase separation is due to buoyancy- in space, oil and water can remain well-mixed for a long period of time. On earth, adding surfactants will stabilize the emulsion. Controlling the dynamics of phase separation (to increase the shelf life of fabric softener, for example) is a multi-billion dollar industry.

Even a simple buoyancy-driven two-fluid phase separation has very complicated dynamics:

http://www.firp.ula.ve/archivos/historicos/57_Chap_Davies.pdf
http://people.umass.edu/mcclemen/FoodEmulsions2008/Presentations(PDF)/(6)Emulsion_Stability.pdf
http://www.eolss.net/Sample-Chapters/C10/E5-10-03-05.pdf
 
DaleSpam said:
What is "the rate of separation". I.e. How do you quantify separation?

Btw, physics without math is silly. The "constraints" that math imposes is that it excludes illogical theories.

Sorry, I was very tired last night and had had a few drinks. I did not actually mean that I want to ignore the math. It is more an issue of, if I think too much about the math, I will get distracted and never have the ability to see the bigger picture.

I generally try to visualize a problem in my head and look at it from as many different ways as possible, and imagine myself inside, until I find a configuration that makes sense to me. Then, I try to go back and connect the dots with the math. If I can make the math work, then great, and if not, then I rethink my idea.

I know am being vague, but I'm not that great at explaining my thought processes, and the idea I am trying to grasp right now has no math to completely explain it. Water and oil will not work for me, because I was thinking of it in the wrong way.

Andy Resnick said:
The question is not so weird- phase separations are an active area of research and have a lot of practical applications (especially in the food and consumer products industries).

Oil and water form a very simple system, the phase separation is due to buoyancy- in space, oil and water can remain well-mixed for a long period of time. On earth, adding surfactants will stabilize the emulsion. Controlling the dynamics of phase separation (to increase the shelf life of fabric softener, for example) is a multi-billion dollar industry.

Even a simple buoyancy-driven two-fluid phase separation has very complicated dynamics:

http://www.firp.ula.ve/archivos/historicos/57_Chap_Davies.pdf
http://people.umass.edu/mcclemen/FoodEmulsions2008/Presentations(PDF)/(6)Emulsion_Stability.pdf
http://www.eolss.net/Sample-Chapters/C10/E5-10-03-05.pdf

Thanks for the links. They are very interesting. It always amazes me how complex ideas are, even when they seem so simple at first glance.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
965
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
660
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
10K