So, do negative prime numbers exist?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the existence of negative prime numbers and their implications on the fundamental theorem of arithmetic. It is established that negative integers, specifically -1 and 1, cannot be classified as prime numbers without causing ambiguity in prime factorization. The conversation also explores the concept of negative powers of primes and their application in defining functions such as the von Mangoldt function and Chebyshev functions. Additionally, the topic of Gaussian integers and their unique factorization properties is introduced, highlighting the complexity of prime definitions in different mathematical contexts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Fundamental theorem of arithmetic
  • Prime factorization concepts
  • Understanding of Gaussian integers
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical functions like the von Mangoldt function
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of negative powers in prime factorization
  • Study the von Mangoldt function and its applications
  • Explore the properties of Gaussian integers and Gaussian primes
  • Investigate the explicit formula in number theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, number theorists, and students interested in advanced concepts of prime numbers and their properties, particularly in relation to factorization and mathematical functions.

NikitaUtiu
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I know that the fundamental theorem of arithmetic states that any integer greater than 1 can be written as an unique prime factorization.
I was wondering if there is any concept of negative prime numbers, because any integer greater than 1 or less than -1 should be able to be written as n = p1 ^ e1 * p2 ^ e2 ... or - (p1 ^ e1 * p2 ^ e2 ...).

Thanks, NikitaUtiu!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I understand what you are saying. But the problem with admitting -1 (or 1) as a prime number is that the fundamental theorem of arithmetic wouldn't work any more. The representation of numbers in terms of primes would be ambiguous. For example, 6 = 2x3 = 2x3x(-1)x(-1). A lot of the theorems on prime numbers would need to be made more complicated to deal with -1.

For this reason, the units http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_(ring_theory ) 1 and -1 are usually treated as separate from prime numbers.

Another idea to consider is to admit negative powers of primes. For example 5/2 is unambiguously expressible as 5^1 x 2^-1. You can use this idea to help define values for the von Mangoldt http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Von_Mangoldt_function and Chebyshev functions at argument 0<x<1. At x = 1 there is a discontinuity owing to the fact that 1 is a power (specifically, the zeroth power) of every prime; the magnitude of the discontinuity is log(4pi^2)=log(2x3x5x7x11x...). When you add this log(4pi^2) to the so-called "explicit formula" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explicit_formula), you see there is now a log(2pi) for x>1 and a -log(2pi) for x < 1. Extending these functions in this way is an interesting concept but isn't all that useful AFAIK.

You might also be interested in learing about the Gaussian integers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_integer.
Basically a+bi where a and b are integers can be factored into "Gaussian primes" . Things are more complicated there, with more units and more kinds of primes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
the theorem says that every integer which is neither zero nor invertible, i.e. not 0, 1, nor -1, can be written as a product of prime integers,. i.e. integers which are themselves neither 0,1, nor -1, and also that have as factors only themselves, minus themselves,a nd 1, -1.

the factorization is not unique, but in any two factorizations, the absolute values of the factors are the same.for example the integer -12 is the product of the primes (-3)(2)(2), and also of (3)(-2)(2), and also (-3)(-2)(-2).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
669
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K